Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:14:57.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Aashna Singh*
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Mohamed Ali
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Satyam Kishore
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Rachel Dobson
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Oluwatosin Atewogboye
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

An on-call email system was put in place to facilitate communication between wards and the on-call doctor, allowing prioritisation of duties according to green, amber and red tasks. Information regarding the patient, nature of request and clinical background are expected in the request form. The doctor is expected to respond to the email within 45 minutes. We completed a re-audit to compare if expected standards were reached in practice and attempt to find any areas of practice that could be improved.

Methods

We collected information on request forms, presence of adequate information and response time by reviewing the Teesside on-call email inbox. One day was randomly chosen from each week for a 24 month period and all emails were reviewed from chosen days. This amounted to (N=680) emails. The compliance was measured against local trust criteria with expected standard of 100%. We assessed four parameters of completion of request forms, providing adequate information including clinical information, patient identification and location, and response within 45 minutes by the doctor.

Results

The compliance in all four standards was subpar, with notable decrease in compliance from previous results. Compliance was less than 70% across all standards, where previously three standards were above this mark. There was a notable increase in requests with inappropriate tasks defined as non-urgent tasks as per trust guidelines.

Conclusion

Better communication can be ensured with use of SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) in the request forms. Mutual sharing of information between doctors, nursing staff and administration with regard to appropriate written communication could constitute the base for structural change and improvement within the workplace. New staff members and doctors should be inducted with regards to the process of on-call email communication. Regular re-auditing and sharing of results is essential to the monitoring of change in compliance.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.