Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:37:25.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality Improvement Project: Improving the Handover Process Between Junior Doctors at the Hammersmith and Fulham Mental Health Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Rathy Ramanathan*
Affiliation:
West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Fariah Khan
Affiliation:
West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Darshana Arakkal
Affiliation:
West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Handover is an integral aspect of clinical work for all doctors. During on calls it involves the transfer of responsibility and accountability for some or all aspects of patient care, to another person on a temporary basis. It is potentially a highly perilous step, and when carried out improperly can cause errors compromising patient safety. In recent times, handover is more important than ever due to the increase in shift patterns of working. Further the General Medical Council (GMC) has clear exceptions that all doctors should ‘keep colleagues well informed when sharing the care of patients.’

Methods

At Hammersmith and Fulham Mental Health Unit there was no formal junior doctor handover in place between changes of shift. Handover of clinical information between regular teams and the long day on call doctor was adhoc, informal and disorganised.

In 2021, we identified this significant patient safety concern, and introduced a handover sheet with a populated table contained pertinent information: date of the request, the location of the patient, the demographic details of the patient, the clinical information regarding the patient, the requested job and whether the task was completed. Junior doctors were instructed to complete the table which was kept in a folder in the junior doctor room when handing over information to the on call doctor. If the request was urgent and a face to face handover was not possible, doctors were encouraged to telephone the on call doctor to provide an additional verbal handover.

Results

The GMC trainee survey identified that handover was a strong negative outlier with a trainee satisfaction rate of 44.79% in 2018. This was evident again in the GMC trainee survey 2019, where handover was again identified as negative outcome in comparison to the average with a trainee satisfaction score of 48.26%.

Having formalised the handover, the GMC trainee survey in 2021 identified a significant improvement in the trainee satisfaction rate of 59.03%; together with the results now being within the national average. Local trainee feedback survey also supported this finding with increased confidence being reported in the handover process.

Conclusion

Good handover does not happen by chance; this was clearly demonstrated following the implementation of a formal and structured proforma within the junior doctor handover at the Hammersmith and Fulham Mental Health Unit. This intervention not only improved the trainee confidence in the handover process but ultimately reduced the potential risk to patient safety.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.