Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:44:39.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychodynamic Psychiatry Education and Training for Trainee Psychiatrists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

James FitzGerald*
Affiliation:
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Lorna Bo
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Fraser Arends
Affiliation:
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Pamela Peters
Affiliation:
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Psychodynamic psychiatry training seminars are a blended supervision and experiential style approach to training health care professionals in reflective practice and formulation. They apply psychodynamic theory through case formulations, seminars, and Balint groups so that health care staff can improve their communication style, formulation skills and enhance their appreciation for patients with complex mental health problems. Our aim is to evaluate the provision of our psychodynamic psychiatry training sessions for psychiatry trainees in the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, and to evaluate the perceived benefits of attending in terms of personal and professional development.

Methods

The evaluation used a standardized mixed-methods approach, with the sample consisting of psychiatry core trainees as part of the regional MRCPsych course. Sessions were delivered via an online format. The evaluation period was between November 2021 and January 2023. Data were gathered via a survey tool, adapted from the literature using Likert scales and free text questions to identify barriers and facilitators to the sessions.

Results

The survey collated data from thirty-seven core trainees ranging between CT1 to CT3. The majority of participants (> 90%) scored the sessions positively across the board in terms of the content of session material, length of training, and quality of delivery. The majority of attendees felt the sessions focused on the relevant clinical issues (97%), were relevant to their training (95%), and felt the group was a safe place to express and process anxieties and frustrations about their work (89%). Notably, the majority either agreed or strongly agreed the group had changed the way they think and practice (91%), including an appreciation of the emotional and symbolic aspects of patients' presentations (89%).

Conclusion

This evaluation reports early findings on psychodynamic psychiatry teaching for psychiatry trainees. Overall, the participants felt the sessions were relevant to their training and improved their personal and professional development. Key benefits of the sessions included increased insight into the emotional and symbolic aspects of the patient's symptoms and clinical issues, team working through cohesion, and the humanity of the doctor in the clinical relationship with the patient. This suggests that the sessions provide a much-needed space to process and reflect on the often-intense demands of clinical work and training. The main theme within barriers to the group processes was external in terms of other clinical demands requiring prioritization.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.