No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2023
The aim of this research was to explore if exception reporting (ER) has improved the work life balance of junior doctors, and if safeguards proposed during junior doctors’ contract have helped doctors in raising concerns about unsafe work patterns or any missed training opportunities.
This study was reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA). We reviewed the number and nature of exception reports completed by trainees between January 2017 and February 2020 by analysing the available ER data (obtained from Guardian of Safe Working) and explored perception of trainees and trainers about exception reporting (ER) by using semi structured and structured surveys. The target population included Core Psychiatry Trainees, GPVTS, Speciality Trainees, Foundation year Trainees and Consultant Psychiatrists.
About 383 exceptions were reported between February 2017 and February 2020 by trainees in BSMHFT. Two separate surveys emailed to trainees and trainers (between December 2020 and July 2021) collected 35 responses from trainees and 22 from trainers.
80% of the trainees had not reported any exceptions in the last one year and 57.14% of the trainers never got involved in exception reporting. Main issues reported were working unsafe hours by trainees (15%), working beyond rostered hours (52.38%) trainers and (52.38%) trainees, failing to achieve educational goals (4.76%) trainers and (10%) trainees, impact on clinical supervision (4.76%) trainers. Reasons for failing ER “Too busy (58.06%), reporting makes no difference (29.03%), a culture to discourage exceptions (29.03%), didn't have logins (16.13%), did not know how to report (35.48%), other reasons. Time off in lieu (TOIL) was commonly reported outcome by trainees (69%) and trainers (62%). 62.07% trainees and 57.14% of trainers neither agreed nor disagreed that ER had improved the quality of training.
Trainees (43.67%) and trainers (58.82%) both did not think that TOIL had resulted in reduction in training time (never 44%). 51.74 % trainees neither agreed nor disagreed that ER made any improvement to their work life balance.
This is the first, mixed method, research looking at both exception reporting data and perception of trainees and trainers. Emerging themes for failure to exception report are guilt, self-blame, culture to discourage, too time consuming, busy workplace, not to offend, reflects being weak.
This research can have wider implications if applied across other trusts nationally, exploring emerging themes. Reasons for declining number of ER needs further exploring of trainees’ anxiety, regarding implications and repercussions of ER, impact of TOIL on continuity of care.
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.