No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2023
To examine the effects of a peer-supported recovery-focused self-management of Psychosis (PRSP) modified from the Crisis-resolution-team Optimisation and RElapse Prevention (CORE) programme (Johnson et al. 2018) for psychotic patients’ recovery, mental state, problem solving ability and other patient outcomes over 18 months follow-up, compared with either a psychoeducation/treatment-as-usual group.
A assessor-blinded, three-arm multicentre RCT was conducted. A list of 198 Chinese patients with recent-onset psychosis randomly selected from four Community Centers for Mental Wellness in Hong Kong (2021–2022) and randomly assigned into one of the three study groups (PRSP, psychoeducation or treatment-as-usual group) by matching with computerized random numbers. After four-month interventions, the patient outcomes were measured at immediately, 9 months and 18 months post-intervention, and analysed on intention-to-treat basis using Generalised Estimating Equation test.
Significant interaction (Group × Time) treatment effects of the PRSP were found on six outcomes (recovery, psychotic symptoms, functioning, problem-solving, and service satisfaction) between three groups at post-test, Wald χ2 = 7.05–21.87, p = 0.02-0.001, with moderate to large effect sizes (η2) of 0.12–0.24, compared to treatment-as-usual. Level of recovery, problem-solving and service satisfaction of the PRSP were also significantly greater improved than psychoeducation group at 9 and 18 months follow-ups with moderate effect sizes (0.07–0.10).
The findings can provide evidence about the long-term effectiveness of the peer-facilitated, recovery-based self-management programme in early psychosis on improving patients’ recovery and mental condition, functioning, and service satisfaction. Self-learning of illness management through effective problem-solving strategies, together with peer-support, are increasingly useful in recovery-focused intervention for early psychosis in views of inadequate healthcare resources/staffs.
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.