Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:34:49.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimise – Service Evaluation of an Innovative Service to Reduce Prescription Medication Dependence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Soraya Mayet
Affiliation:
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, United Kingdom Hull and York Medical School, Hull, United Kingdom
Zuzana Drozdova*
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom
Sarah Easingwood
Affiliation:
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
Kate Nadin
Affiliation:
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
Merran Morgan
Affiliation:
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
Eleanor Blakeston
Affiliation:
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
Dave Reade
Affiliation:
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Opioids, gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines and z-drugs cause dependence, increase deaths, and have been found to be ineffective for long-term conditions. Despite the risks, these are some of the most prescribed medications. In response, we worked with commissioners to develop an innovative service ‘Optimise’ for the treatment of prescription medication dependence. Optimise aimed to support patients to reduce and stop prescribed medications that can cause dependence when the medications were not clinically recommended.

Methods

Optimise started in February 2020 in the North of United Kingdom. The service was staffed by two addiction nurses, with support from the Addictions Consultant Psychiatrist and team leaders. GP's identified suitable patients, gained consent to refer and referred to Optimise. Patients received a harm information and service letter, after which they were offered telephone triage, assessment, and ongoing psycho-social support. The nurses worked closely with GP's and advised on prescribed medication reduction plans. Due to COVID-19, most patients had telephone appointments.

Humber Teaching NHS FT service evaluation approval. All referrals were reviewed retrospectively to assess demographics and outcomes. Friends and family (FFT) test offered to patients. Data were analysed via excel.

Results

Twenty-one GPs referred 258 patients (Feb 20-Oct 22). Most were female (70%) and all white; mean age 56 (21-97) years. Patients were prescribed opioids (92%), gabapentinoids (32%), benzodiazepines (9%), and/or zopiclone (7%). The most common opioid prescribed was morphine, followed by oxycodone and fentanyl. A letter was sent to 254 patients referred, 217 patients attended telephone triage, with 148 agreed to work with Optimise. Of 145 (56% of referred patients) who attended the assessment, 86% gradually stopped (n=24; 17%) or reduced (n=100;69%) their prescribed medications.

Patient feedback:

Eighteen patients completed FFT and stated the service was good or very good.

The nurse was informative and has helped me reduce my medications when I thought I wouldn't be able to.’

‘Listened to my concerns and gave me time before changing my medication.’

Conclusion

Optimise is an innovative service that has helped patients of all ages to reduce and stop prescribed opioids, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids and zopiclone, that can cause dependence, increase overdose risks, and were not clinically recommended. These patients had previously not been able to reduce or stop these medications. It is positive that with two nurses there has been such a great impact with excellent outcomes and good patient engagement. Commissioners should look at funding similar services to enhance the support for patients who are prescribed medications that can cause dependence.

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.