Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:09:56.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing the Interval Between Anti-Psychotic Depot Injections for Service Users on 3-Weekly Injections: A Quality Improvement Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Aditi Pandey*
Affiliation:
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Parisah Hussain
Affiliation:
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Ruben Perumal
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Marc El Khoury
Affiliation:
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Clare Smith
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Our aim was to improve service user satisfaction by increasing the interval between their depot injections where clinically feasible. By doing this, we aimed to reduce attendance at the South Kensington and Chelsea Community Mental Health Team (SK&C CMHT) depot clinic by 25% over a period of 3 months, improving the workload for nurses running the clinic.

Methods

Our first baseline measure was data gathered about service user satisfaction with their depot. Our second baseline measure was the average number of service users attending the depot clinic per week between May and November 2022. The balance measure was a medical review 3 months post-interval change to ensure there were no negative impacts from this change.

10 service users on 3-weekly anti-psychotic depots were identified. Our team devised criteria to select service users who were appropriate for our project. This included: a stable mental state, minimal side effects on the current dose, no breakthrough symptoms, good engagement with the depot clinic, and scope to increase the current dose. These service users were discussed with their care coordinator, consultant and depot clinic nurse. If the criteria were met, the dose and interval change was discussed with our pharmacist. Finally, service users were consented and their depot charts were amended.

Results

The interval between depot injections for 2 service users was increased from 3 to 4 weeks on December 5th, 2022. The other 8 service users failed to meet the criteria set out in our methodology.

These 2 service users were asked to fill in a questionnaire on January 23rd, 2023. They reported that “it was not comfortable having an injection” and that “having it every 4 weeks was better” and “less hassle”. Their first medical review did not raise any safety concerns.

On average, 20 service users attend the SK&C CMHT depot clinic every week. There was no change in the average number of patients attending the depot clinic in the last two months as only 2 service users had their depot interval successfully altered.

Conclusion

Service users on depot injections can benefit from increasing the interval between their injections where clinically feasible. We would like to repeat this project for service users on 2-weekly depots and reassess if that makes an impact on satisfaction levels and attendance numbers at our depot clinic.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.