Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:49:24.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving the Quality of Valproate Prescribing in Adult Mental Health Services - POMH Topic 20b - Enhanced Community Rehabilitation Service (ECRS), Bognor Regis, West Sussex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Labib Hussain*
Affiliation:
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Shuchita Ahmed
Affiliation:
Brighton & Sussex Medical School, East Sussex, United Kingdom
Elizabeth West
Affiliation:
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Claire Tanner
Affiliation:
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, West Sussex, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims:/Background

The licensed indications for Sodium Valproate are narrow however the medication is commonly prescribed amongst mental health services in the UK. Such practice can be associated with ineffective and poorly tolerated treatment, especially given the limited evidence re efficacy of 'off label' use of Valproate.

Aims and auditable outcomes

  • Annual review of risk benefit balance for those on continued Valproate treatment to include asking about adverse effects, medication adherence and therapeutic benefit Any 'off label' prescription of Valproate, should be explained to the patient and documented

  • Clinician's reasons for initiating Valproate treatment should be documented in clinical records

  • Plasma level monitoring of Valproate treatment should not be used unless there is evidence of concerns about medication adherence, dose related side effects and/or ineffectiveness

  • Prior to initiating Valproate, the following should be documented in the clinical records: Full Blood Count (FBC), Liver Function Tests (LFTs) and Weight and/or BMI

  • Review within first three months of Valproate treatment should include: Screening for common side effects and assessment of the response of treatment

Methods

Only 7 of 51 patients on the ECRS caseload were eligible for the study i.e. currently prescribed Valproate, irrespective of age.

Audit forms provided by POMH team. Clinical records used to complete included all electronic/paper notes, letters, and other patient information available to clinical team.

Due to nature of information required we involved doctors and nurses from the clinical team.

Results

6/7 (86%) of patients had clinical reasoning for Valproate prescription documented in their clinical records - 5/7 (71%) were prescribed 'off-label' - mainly as adjunct for refractory Schizophrenia.

7/7 (100%) of patients had a documented review in the past year which included asking about adherence to their Valproate medication.

2/7 (29%) of patients had plasma monitoring of Valproate treatment in the past year as part of routine hospital admission blood tests. No evidence of concerns for the other patients documented otherwise.

5/7 (71%) had treatment initiated with Valproate more than 5 years ago, hence unable to see if prescription initiations were explained to patients due to lack of historical records.

Conclusion

First cycle of this internal audit which forms part of a wider national prescribing audit, demonstrates that the ECRS team are generally meeting current standards for Valproate prescription.

Despite the majority (71%) being initiated >5y ago - 86% of our patients have documented clinical reasons for ongoing prescription, with100% having a documented review in the past year.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.