Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:30:44.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving facilitation of ECT treatment for patients in an acute medical hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Vatsala Mishra*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Liaison Team, King's College Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Chun Chiang Sin Fai Lam
Affiliation:
Mental Health Liaison Team, King's College Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Marilia Calcia
Affiliation:
Mental Health Liaison Team, King's College Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Isabel McMullen
Affiliation:
Mental Health Liaison Team, King's College Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

A Quality Improvement Project aiming to streamline facilitation of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatment for psychiatric patients at a general acute hospital and reduce cancellation rates via the use of a checklist.

ECT treatment is an essential aspect of psychiatric care for patients with severe depression or treatment-resistant psychosis. Facilitation of ECT treatment is an uncommon task for liaison psychiatry and the medical and nursing teams responsible for patients’ medical care. Between August-October 2019, this liaison psychiatry team had 3 patients undergoing ECT treatment a total of 13 times, with treatment being cancelled on 4 occasions. After engagement with stakeholders from the acute medical teams, the liaison team and the ECT suite team, key areas requiring intervention were identified to help reduce the rates of cancellation. Areas identified included a lack of ownership on the logistic and operational aspects of ECT amongst staff, a lack of knowledge of what the process involved and a lack of confidence in managing said patients. Difficulties in communication between teams and accurate documentation may contribute to errors and cancellation of ECT sessions, which in turn would delay treatment and impact on patient safety and clinical outcomes.

Method

The first author, a Foundation Year 1 doctor, developed a 10-point checklist to be referred to when arranging ECT for patients, to ensure errors were not made which could lead to missed treatment and delayed recovery. The tasks and responsibilities of each key member of the team were clearly identified. This checklist was included in all ECT patients’ files and teaching was provided to staff involved. Feedback was obtained from staff involved regarding the clarity of information and their confidence in managing such cases.

Result

In the month following initial intervention the liaison psychiatry team organised 12 ECT sessions. The checklist was pasted into notes the day before each ECT session and 0 sessions were missed for avoidable reasons. Feedback from staff showed all teams felt more confident co-ordinating ECT treatment as a result of the checklist.

Conclusion

Creating a 10-point checklist for the facilitation of ECT treatment in patients at a medical hospital was beneficial in reducing avoidable errors from 16% to 0%. The liaison psychiatrists, medical doctors, and nurses involved reported greater confidence in managing patients undergoing ECT and described the checklist as enhancing the feeling of teamwork and communication within the multi-disciplinary team, and felt it had improved patient safety and clinical outcomes.

Type
Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.