Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:56:17.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Prophylactic Medication Use on the Recurrence of Bipolar Episodes in the BDRN Pregnancy Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Marisa Casanova Dias*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Amy Perry
Affiliation:
Worcester University, Worcester, United Kingdom
Mark Kelson
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
Katherine Gordon-Smith
Affiliation:
Worcester University, Worcester, United Kingdom
Nick Craddock
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Lisa Jones
Affiliation:
Worcester University, Worcester, United Kingdom
Arianna Di Florio
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Ian Jones
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Women with bipolar disorder have a high recurrence rate in the perinatal period. However, the use of prophylactic medication can be a concern during pregnancy and breastfeeding. There are few studies looking at the impact of prophylactic medication on the risk of recurrence.The aims of this study are to describe the use of medication in women with bipolar disorder in the perinatal period and the impact of that prophylactic medication on the rate of postnatal recurrence.

Methods

The BDRN (Bipolar Disorder Research Network Study) is the largest individual network of individuals with bipolar disorder and related mood disorders in the world. The BDRN pregnancy study is a prospective observational study which took place in the UK. We collected sociodemographic, clinical and medication data from pregnant women with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and who were euthymic entering the postpartum period. The clinical data were collected via interviews during pregnancy and the postpartum and access to clinical records where those were available.

Data were analysed for association using χ2 tests and logistic regression.

Results

Our total sample for this analysis comprised of 103 women who met the criteria.

We found that 71 (70%) were taking medication at delivery: 43 (43%) antipsychotics, 9 (9%) antidepressants, 10 (10%) mood stabilisers, (6 lithium, 4 anticonvulsants and 9 multiple medication classes).

Of the total sample, 44 (43%) experienced a postpartum recurrence: 21 (20%) had an episode of postpartum psychosis, 15 (15%) of non-psychotic depression and 8 (8%) of hypomania. Of the postpartum psychotic episodes 11 were of mania with psychosis, 8 of mania without psychosis and 2 of psychotic depression.

There was no significant association between taking medication at delivery and postpartum recurrence χ2 (1)=0.116, p=0.73.

In a multivariable analysis there continued to be no association when adjusted for age, ethnicity, parity, severity (previous admissions, age at impairment, bipolar subtype) and previous psychotic symptoms aOR 1.35 95%CI [0.45; 4.00], p=0.59.

Conclusion

A high number of bipolar women are taking medication at delivery and in the majority, antipsychotics are prescribed. The postnatal recurrence rate in both medicated and unmedicated women is high.

Our findings align with recent electronic health records and observational studies, but differ from older clinical cohort and higher Lithium-prescribing sample studies. Limitations include the study design and confounding by indication. Further research in larger populations is necessary to inform clinical decision-making for women and their healthcare providers.

Type
Psychopharmacology
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.