Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:29:56.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the Training the Trainer Course for Psychiatry Higher Trainees in the West Midlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Meena Murugan*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Bijal Sangoi
Affiliation:
Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust, Stafford, United Kingdom
Feroz Nainar
Affiliation:
Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The Royal College of Psychiatrists sets out ‘Education and Training’ as one of the High Level Outcomes (HLOs) in its GMC approved curriculum for higher speciality trainees in Psychiatry. The West Midlands (WM) School of Psychiatry runs a well-established 3-day Training the Trainer (TTT) course to support acquisition of teaching skills and key capabilities to help prepare trainees to become trainers as Consultants.

We aim to explore the views and attitudes held by WM Psychiatry higher trainees towards the current TTT course and other teaching opportunities available across the region.

Methods

An anonymous online scoping survey was sent to all WM Psychiatry higher trainees, via Microsoft Forms, in January 2023. This comprehensive survey included questions on the trainees’ awareness of the TTT course and available teaching opportunities, as well as support and barriers in accessing these. We designed dichotomous, rating and free text questions to generate both quantitative and qualitative data.

Results

Key findings of the survey included:

  • 27 out of 40 trainees responded. All subspecialty training programmes were represented.

  • Many trainees were aware of the WM TTT course (81%). No trainees had accessed private TTT courses.

  • Most trainees felt the current available opportunities allowed them to meet the curriculum requirements (82%) and felt their supervisor could provide support in gaining teaching experiences (93%).

  • Only two-thirds of trainees felt the current opportunities prepared them to be an effective Consultant trainer (67%). Some were also uncertain of teaching opportunities available in the deanery (41%).

  • Trainees expressed a preference of learning through small group tutorials, interactive workshops and experiential learning.

  • Trainees requested incorporating content around innovative technology in medical education including artificial intelligence and simulation as well as formal qualifications in medical education.

Conclusion

The project has shown that the current TTT course is effective in supporting Psychiatry higher trainees meet their curriculum requirements, however there is a scope to adjust the content to meet their changing needs and align with digital advancements in medical education. We suggest the course should be delivered in a more interactive and engaging manner for example using breakout rooms and workshops. To ensure all trainees are aware of the course and teaching opportunities available, an information leaflet outlining the TTT course will be sent out as part of the induction process. It is hoped that with these improvements, the needs of Psychiatry higher trainees will be better met as they move forwards in their careers and become Consultant trainers.

Type
2 Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.