No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2023
For patients with depression, the likelihood of remission decreases with each subsequent treatment failure. Per European Medicines Agency guidance, treatment resistant depression (TRD) is defined as nonresponse to ≥2 consecutive treatments at adequate dosage and duration in the current depressive episode. In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), esketamine nasal spray (NS) increased the probability of achieving remission and remaining relapsefree, compared with quetiapine extended release (QXR) in patients with TRD. Here, we report the efficacy of esketamine NS vs QXR in patient subgroups with 2 or ≥3 consecutive prior treatment failures (PTFs).
ESCAPETRD was a phase IIIb trial comparing the efficacy of esketamine NS with QXR in patients with TRD. Patients (N = 676) were randomised 1:1 to esketamine NS (n = 336; 56/84 mg; twice weekly, weekly, or every 2 weeks [wks]) or QXR (n = 340; 150–300 mg daily, both in combination with an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Randomisation was stratified by age (18-64 years; 65–74 years) and PTFs (2; ≥3).
The primary endpoint of remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≤10) at Wk8 and the secondary endpoint of remaining relapse-free through Wk32 after remission at Wk8, were analysed in PTF patient subgroups and compared between study arms, with treatment discontinuation considered as a negative outcome. The effect on time to remission was assessed using hazard ratios (HR) from a Cox regression model.
Of the randomised patients, 415 (61.4%; esketamine NS: 204, QXR: 211) had experienced 2 PTFs and 261 (38.6%; esketamine NS: 132, QXR: 129) had experienced ≥3.
Of patients with 2 PTFs, 54/204 (26.5%) esketamine NS-treated patients and 46/211 (21.8%) Q-XR-treated patients achieved remission at Wk8 (p = 0.267). Of patients with ≥3 PTFs, 37/132 (28.0%) and 14/129 (10.9%) patients achieved remission at Wk8 in esketamine NS and Q-XR arms, respectively (p < 0.001). Of patients with 2 and ≥3 PTFs, 49/204 (24.0%) and 24/132 (18.2%) of esketamine NS-treated patients and 38/211 (18.0%) and 10/129 (7.8%) of Q-XR-treated patients achieved remission at Wk8 without relapse to Wk32 (p = 0.133 and p = 0.013), respectively.
Esketamine NS significantly improved time to remission, with a greater effect in the ≥3 PTF subgroup (2 PTFs: HR = 1.547 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.210–1.976]; p < 0.001 vs ≥3 PTFs: HR = 2.066 [95% CI 1.469–2.907]; p < 0.001).
Esketamine NS demonstrated a significantly superior remission rate versus QXR at Wk8 in patients with ≥3 PTFs, and significantly shorter time to remission versus Q-XR in both subgroups.
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.