No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2023
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) has been used since the 1930s for the treatment of depressive illness, mania and catatonia. This audit aimed to appraise the ECT pathway followed by the Behavioral Sciences Institute at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. The authors analysed the pathway's compliance against the standards set out in the local Al Ain Hospital guidelines and The Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) standards, with a particular focus on capacity and consent issues.
This audit involved a retrospective review of case notes. After obtaining the relevant ethical approval for the audit, we collected the case notes of all patients who received ECT over a period of three years between May 2019 and June 2022. The audit sample comprised 30 patients, both from the inpatient and outpatient services in Al Ain Hospital. A questionnaire was developed to capture the required information anonymously. Data collection took place between September and November 2022.
Out of the total 30 patients, 21 (70 %) were males. The average age of the sample was 31 years, with a range of 19-71 years. Twelve patients (40%) were Emirati citizens, with Ethiopian nationals (17%) being the second largest ethnic group. A significant majority (90%) of the patients who received ECT were under the inpatient psychiatric services at Al Ain Hospital. The sample studied received, on average, eight sessions of ECT. Major depressive disorder (43% of the sample) was the most common diagnosis, followed by severe mania at 37% and Catatonia at 17%.
Of 30 patients, 16 (53%) had no documentation of their mental capacity to accept ECT on the consent papers. Out of 8 patients deemed lacking capacity, only 4 had proper documentation of the reasons for lacking capacity. Reviewing the consent papers demonstrated that 20 patients (67%) had no documentation of discussing the risk and benefits of the procedure.
This audit has identified areas for improvement in the implementation of Al Ain Hospital's current ECT pathway. The authors have suggested enhanced staff training on consent issues involving ECT, emphasizing better documentation of the decision-making process. Considering the possible medicolegal consequences, a particular area for documenting discussions of the risk and benefits of the procedure should be included in the ECT consent form. We aim to re-audit the practice after one year of implementing the above action plan.
No financial sponsorship has been received for this evaluative exercise.
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.