Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:49:05.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digital Psychoeducation for First Episode Psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Iman Ahmedani*
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Holly Lyle
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Wei Han Lim
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Young people with their first episode of psychosis can feel lonely and isolated. Psychoeducation has been shown to increase patient insight, reduce the risk of relapse and forms part of the Quality Standards for Early Intervention in Psychosis Services. Our aim was to increase knowledge of psychosis in service users in an urban cohort by delivering psychoeducation in an interactive online format, due to the restrictions on socialising during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hoped this would serve to empower service users, allow them to connect with each other and offer hope through understanding.

Methods

Appropriate service users aged 18–35 years were recruited from the caseload with the support of care coordinators, with 28 participating overall over a period of ten months. One-hour Zoom sessions of 2–4 participants were facilitated by a junior doctor. Each session consisted of a mix of teaching about basic neuroscience, including brain structure and the dopamine hypothesis theory, interspersed with factual quiz questions and opportunities for free-form answers in ‘thought clouds’. These explored feelings and experiences associated with psychosis. Data were also collected quantitatively in the form of anonymous self-rated pre- and post- session questionnaires on a 10-point Likert scale. These included self-reported questions about the understanding of the brain, psychosis, symptoms, medications and fear associated with the illness. Engagement was increased through the creation of flyers and reminder messages.

Results

Thought clouds constructed during the sessions described feelings such as ‘panic’, ‘unease’, ‘dreamy’ and ‘broken reality’. On average over all sessions, there was an increase of 1.2 points in understanding of the brain, 2.6 points in understanding of ‘psychosis’, 2 points in understanding of how symptoms relate to the brain, 1.8 points in the belief that psychosis can be managed with therapy, 1.5 points in the belief that psychosis can be managed by medication, and unfortunately a 0.1 point increase in fear of the disease – perhaps associated with increased knowledge of the disease process. Encouragingly, 91% of final responses in the sessions were positive, demonstrating hopefulness.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that innovative digital psychoeducation sessions provide a highly effective way to deliver information to young people with psychosis whilst also allowing connection with peers. This model represents a great learning opportunity for trainees, and could be easily replicated in other geographical locations, or mental health conditions. We have also invited and encouraged co-production with service users.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Arranged by the presentation category selected by the submitter and by order of presenting author surname.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.