Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:30:18.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical Audit and Reaudit of Driving Risk Assessment During Leave Risk Discussions Within an Adult Mental Health Inpatient Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Muredzwa Adelina Muzenda*
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Zhiyu Loh
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Nasr Mahmoud
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Aqif Khan
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Jatinder Kour
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Amechi Nzekwe
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

All detained patients should have a leave risk discussion carried out prior to commencement of home leave. Driving risk must be clearly discussed and captured during the assessment. Driving advice as per DVLA guidance must be documented in case notes and discharge summaries. The aim was to audit and reaudit the use and quality of the driving risk assessment during leave risk discussions within adult mental health inpatient wards at one site under the Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust. The authors hypothesise that compliance to local policies could be improved upon.

Methods

Standards were set based on local policies. The audit was conducted across all adult acute inpatient wards within the identified mental health hospital. All inpatients who went on a period of home leave during their admission and ultimately discharged during the period from 1 April 2021 to 30 April 2021 (initial audit) and 1 October 2021 to 31 October 2021 (reaudit) were assessed. The data were collected using an audit tool. An Excel spreadsheet was used to collate data: specifically driving status of the patient, whether a leave risk discussion which captured driving risk was carried out, and whether DVLA advice was captured on discharge letters.

Results

48 patients (19 were drivers) during the initial audit and 27 patients (9 were drivers) during the reaudit met the inclusion criteria. For the initial audit, overall compliance for leave risk discussion (73%), specifically for driving risk assessment, did not meet target compliance. Only 5% of drivers were given written DVLA guidance on discharge letters. The reaudit showed a 100% compliance in the use and quality of leave risk discussion. 56% of patients had written confirmation of discussion on DVLA driving advice recorded on discharge summary.

Conclusion

There has been significant improvement in the use and quality of leave risk discussion, and documentation of DVLA driving advice on discharge summary during the reaudit.

The results were discussed at the Regional Audit meeting and the Inpatient Leadership Meeting. The following improvement plan was agreed and implemented:

  1. 1. Regular communication amongst Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) during Leave Risk Discussion. One healthcare professional assigned to inform patient of the advice and capture conversation on case notes.

  2. 2. Junior doctor induction to reiterate importance of capturing DVLA advice on discharge letters.

  3. 3. MDT to discuss driving risk and advice during discharge meetings. “Driving advice discussion” to be added to discharge meeting checklist.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.