Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:23:12.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are patients self-referring to Lewisham Community Wellbeing (LCW) when advised to do so by the assessment and liaison psychiatry team?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Gautam Bhatia*
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Thileepan Thevarajan
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Jadesh Manivannan
Affiliation:
medical student, Kings College London
Danny Majidian
Affiliation:
medical student, Kings College London
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

It is well-recognised by the RCPsych that mental illness is both a cause and consequence of social exclusion, and thus social inclusion is an important part of recovery and leads to better outcomes for patients.

The Lewisham Assessment and Liaison team Neighbourhood 4 (A&L N4) is a CMHT service that acts as an intake team for all referrals into secondary care mental health services, with the purpose of assessment and brief intervention. Currently, if a patient is assessed to potentially benefit from our local social inclusion service, Lewisham Community Wellbeing (LCW), they are advised to self-refer. However, there is no follow-up as to whether patients go on to do this.

Therefore, this audit aimed to calculate:

How many patients are advised to self-refer to LCW (advised referral)

How many of these patients make the self-referral to LCW (completed referral)

Method

The electronic notes for patients who were accepted by the A&L N4 team from July to September 2020 were retrospectively analysed to see if an LCW self-referral was advised. A list of these patients was then given to LCW to check whether they had self-referred.

Result

A&L N4 worked with 82 patients during the study period. 16 patients were advised to self-refer to LCW- an advised referral rate of 19.5%. There was notable month-to-month variation in the advised referral rate- 29.6% in July vs. 9.4% in September.

Of the 16 patients advised to self-refer to LCW, 5 did so- a completed referral rate of 31.3%.

Conclusion

The completed referral rate of 31.3% is difficult to interpret given there are no standards in this area. On one hand, the self-referral process as it currently exists is functioning; on the other, some two-thirds of patients are not making the most of a service deemed to be of benefit to their recovery.

To improve completed referral rates, efforts should be made to better ‘sell’ LCW to the patient. Potential ways of doing this would be through closer working with LCW- for example, LCW could join the clinical meetings more regularly to discuss new services they offer and feedback any patients A&L has referred. There should also be emphasis on making the self-referral process as straightforward as possible.

A secondary finding was the notable monthly variation in advised referral rates. It is important to ensure the A&L team are consistently identifying the right patients for LCW, and again, closer liaison with LCW would help achieve this.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.