Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:07:59.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Audit of Clinicians Completing Independent Seclusion Reviews (Trust-Wide Audit Within Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear, NHS Foundation Trust)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Nicole Edwards*
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
Edward Fearnley
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (CNTW) seclusion policy states that if a patient has been nursed in seclusion for 8 consecutive hours (or 12 hours intermittently over a 48 hour period), then an independent seclusion review (ISR) is mandated. One member of this ISR team must include an Approved Clinician (AC). Our aim was to establish whether an AC (including non-medical) was present at ISRs. If the doctor was not an AC, we established whether a discussion with an AC was documented.

Methods

The method included reviewing all episodes of seclusion that took place in CNTW between the 01.10.2021 and the 31.12.2021 (i.e. Q4 for 2021). All electronic (RiO) seclusion records and progress notes were examined to determine who was present at each ISR occurring within each episode of seclusion.

Results

260 episodes of seclusion occurred in Q4 2021 within CNTW. 96 episodes continued long enough to trigger an ISR.

Of the 96 episodes, a total of 221 ISRs were examined.

Of those senior clinicians present at ISR, 83% were medical members of staff, 11% were non-medical ACs and 6% were neither.

Of the medical clinicians present at ISR, 68% were not AC grade.

Of the different grades of non-AC doctors present at ISRs, 72% were "SHO grade".

The overall breakdown of non AC medical staff included 6% F2 Doctors, 16% Higher Trainees, 19% Speciality Doctors, 4% Associate Specialists, 5% were International Fellows and 1% Senior Trust Fellows.

29% of ISRs occurred outside of normal working hours.

71% occurred 9:00-17:00 Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays).

0% of non-AC medical ISRs had a documented discussion with the AC.

Conclusion

Nearly a third of IRSs occurred outside of standard (contracted) working hours for doctors.

In addition, the majority of ISRs were completed by non AC doctors. The majority of these doctors were "SHO" level Doctors (including Core Trainees, GP Trainees and Foundation Trainees).

The audit was presented at the CNTW Seclusion Steering Group, with actions including a change to the seclusion policy. This now explicitly states that ISRs must be conducted by an AC “unless in the case of extreme circumstances, and in such cases the review should be discussed with an AC”.

There are additional plans to develop consistent approaches for organising ISRs (to ensure the vast majority happen within normal working hours and with an AC present).

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.