Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:16:20.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brook House immigration removal centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2024

Giuseppe Spoto
Giuseppe Spoto*
Affiliation:
FRCPsych, MA, FAcadMEd, MEWI, Consultant Psychiatrist, Independent Doctors Federation, London, UK. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Correspondence
Information
BJPsych Bulletin , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 2024 , pp. 66
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

The findings of the public inquiry into the immigration removal centre (IRC) known as Brook House (BBC News, 19 September 2023) are alarming but in my opinion not altogether surprising.

In 2011, I was employed to undertake a pilot study at the IRC on behalf of my then employer, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, with a view to improving services. The study lasted a total of 6 months, and detailed proposals were made; however, my recommendations were shelved.

I am glad to hear about the suggestion made by the inquiry chair Kate Eves that the law be changed to limit the duration of detention at IRCs such as Brook House.

I have for many years as a consultant psychiatrist and expert witness in immigration cases recommended that where the authorities are unable to make a decision about the future of a claimant in a timely fashion, the claimant should be released immediately.

It appears from the inquiry that services at Brook House are substandard at every level and that better services are needed in this critical area of practice. Psychiatry should lead as it once did in the prison service.

Declaration of interest

None

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.