Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:58:20.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographical analysis of vegetation structure and sightings for four large bird species in the Kruger National Park, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

A. C. Kemp ,
G. W. Benn  and
K. S. Begg
A. C. Kemp
Affiliation:
Department of Birds, Transvaal Museum, P. O. Box 413, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa
G. W. Benn
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa.
K. S. Begg
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The extensive spatial organization of many large-bird populations is difficult to assess. We used a geographic information system to correlate vegetation structure with random sightings for four large bird species that occur throughout the 20,000 km2 Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa. Vegetation structure was assessed visually during 1991-1992 for the 1093 2-5′-quadrats that cover the KNP. Sightings were made during 1991-1994 of Kori Bustard Ardeotis kori, Martial Eagle Polemaetus bellicosus, Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotus and Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri, and their nest sites. As control, comparative data on ground hornbills were also available from annual aerial censuses during 1982-1994, and from records of nest sites during 1966-1996. Each species had its highest positive correlation with a different set of vegetation categories, ranging in value from the hornbill (1.13) and vulture (1.15) up to the eagle (1.32) and bustard (1.49). Nest sites had higher correlations (hornbill 1.65, vulture 2.85) than records of free-living birds. The same vegetation categories that had the highest correlations with random sightings of ground hornbills and their nests also had the highest correlations with the more extensive and systematic data from aerial census and long-term nest records. Our method of correlating vegetation structure with random data is predictive, testable and has application to the conservation management of other sparsely distributed species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 89 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1998

References

Referances

Gertenbach, W. P. D. (1980) Rainfall patterns in the Kruger National Park. Koedoe zy. 35–43.Google Scholar
Gertenbach, W. P. D. (1983) Landscapes of the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 26: 9–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. A., Allan, D. G., Underhill, L. G., Herremans, A. J., Tree, A. J., Parker, V. and Brown, C. J. (1997) The atlas of southern African birds,1. Non-passerines. Cape Town: Birdlife South Africa and Avian Demographic Unit.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. L., Lombard, A. D., Kemp, A. C. and Benn, G. A. (1996) Geographical analysis of six rare bird species in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 6: 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, S. C. J. and Viljoen, P. C. (1988) Ecological aerial monitoring in the Kruger National Park. S. Afr. Natn. Sci. Prog. Rep. 157: 308–315.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. (1988) The behavioural ecology of the southern ground hornbill: are competitive offspring at a premium? Pp. 267–271 in Elzen, R. van den, Schuchmann, K. L. and Schmidt-Koenig, K., eds. Current topics in avian biology. Bonn: Proc. Internatn.-100 Deutscheornitologische-Gesellschaft Meeting.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. (1992) Wanderers in search of wild places. Getaway 02 1992: 66–67.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. and Begg, K. S. (1996) Nest sites of the Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, and conservation implications. Ostrich 67: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I. (1974) Don't forget the big birds. Afr. Wildl. 28: 12–13.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I. (1980) The biology of the Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri (Vigors) (Aves: Bucerotidae). Ann. Transvaal Mus. 32: 65–1001.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C., Joubert, S. C. J. and Kemp, M. I. (1989) Distribution of southern ground hornbills in the Kruger National Park in relation to some environmental factors. S. Afr. j. Wildl. Res. 19: 93–98.Google Scholar
Kemp, A., Chadwick, P. and Begg, K. (1991) Kruger Park's rarer bird species studied. Custos 20 (7): 12–15.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C., Begg, K. S., Benn, G. A. and Chadwick, P. (1997) A visual assessment of vegetation structure for the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 40 (2): 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1994) The effects of spatial scale on ecological questions and answers. Pp. 1–18 in Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. and Webb., N. R., eds. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, R. I., Stuart, S. N. and Howell, K. M. (1989) A methodology for analysing rare species distribution patterns utilizing GIS technology: the rare birds of Tanzania. Landscape Ecol. 2: 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarboton, W. R. and Allan, D. G. (1984) The status and conservation of birds of prey in the Transvaal. Transvaal Mus. Monogr. 3: 1–115.Google Scholar
Tarboton, W. R., Kemp, M. I. and Kemp, A. C. (1980) Birds of the Transvaal. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum.Google Scholar
van Zyl, A. J. (1992) Do breeding pairs of Martial Eagles hold “super-normal” territories? Gabar 7: 9–10.Google Scholar
Watson, R. T. (1990) Population dynamics of the Bateleur in the Kruger National Park. Ostrich 61: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar