Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T06:28:49.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seeds consumed by three sympatric species of threatened Sporophila seedeaters: lessons for conservation and grassland restoration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2024

Ismael Franz*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ornitologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Interações & Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Departamento de Ecologia, Zoologia e Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Brazil
Márcio Repenning
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Aves Aquáticas e Tartarugas Marinhas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Cristiano E. Rovedder
Affiliation:
Terra Consultoria Ambiental LTDA, Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil
Ilsi I. Boldrini
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Carla S. Fontana
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Populações e Comunidades, Departamento e Centro de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Ismael Franz; Email: [email protected]

Summary

Resource partitioning is a critical mechanism underlying the coexistence of close relative species that feed on similar resources. Based on foraging data, we built a plant–seedeater interaction network for three sympatric species of Neotropical seedeaters – namely Tropeiro Seedeater Sporophila beltoni, Black-bellied Seedeater Sporophila melanogaster, and Tawny-bellied Seedeater Sporophila hypoxantha, and tested to what extent the three species shared resources. The interaction network was non-nested and modular, forming three modules, each one comprising one seedeater species and their most consumed plants, indicating the existence of resource partitioning. Modules may result from multiple non-exclusive factors, including differences among seedeater species in habitat use, bill sizes, feeding habits, structure of vegetation for nesting, and abiotic factors that influence plant composition. Our results indicate that the effective conservation of these species requires the protection of areas that include the three distinct subsets of plants used by these birds during the breeding season and also indicates which plants may be used for the restoration of grasslands in the region.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Almeida-Neto, M. and Ulrich, W. (2011). A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling & Software 26, 173178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, B.O., Koch, C., Boldrini, I.I., Vélez-Martin, E., Hasenack, H., Hermann, J.M. et al. (2015). Grassland degradation and restoration: a conceptual framework of stages and thresholds illustrated by southern Brazilian grasslands. Natureza & Conservação 13, 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azpiroz, A.B., Isacch, J.P., Dias, R.A., Di Giacomo, A.S., Fontana, C.S. and Palarea, C.M. (2012). Ecology and conservation of grassland birds in southeastern South America: a review. Journal of Field Ornithology 83, 217246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, S.J. (2016). Improved community detection in weighted bipartite networks. Royal Society Open Science 3, 140536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BirdLife International (2017). Sporophila beltoni (amended version of 2017 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. Available at https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T103818207A119211827.en (accessed 20 November 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BirdLife International (2019). Sporophila melanogaster. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. Available at https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T22723509A156936915.en (accessed 20 November 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldrini, I.I. (1997). Campos do Rio Grande do Sul: caracterização fisionômica e problemática ocupacional. Revista Brasileira Biociências 56, 139.Google Scholar
CONSEMA/SC (2011). Lista das Espécies da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção em Santa Catarina [List of Threatened Animals from the State of Santa Catarina]. CONSEMA Resolution 002. Florianópolis: CONSEMA.Google Scholar
Di Giacomo, A.G. (2005). Aves de la Reserva El Bagual. In Historia natural y paisaje de la Reserva El Bagual, Provincia de Formosa. Monografía de Aves Argintinas. Buenos Aires: Temas de Naturaleza y Conservación, pp. 201465.Google Scholar
Franz, I. and Fontana, C.S. (2013). Breeding biology of the Tawny-bellied Seedeater (Sporophila hypoxantha) in southern Brazilian upland grasslands. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125, 280292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilha, I.N.M. and Ragusa-Netto, J. (2023). Seedeaters and seeds at a Tecoma Savanna in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. Ornitología Neotropical 34, 128137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losos, J.B. (2008). Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters 11, 9951003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R. and Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist 101, 377385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, P.K., Vizentin-Bugoni, J., Oliveira, G.M., Oliveira, P.E. and Dalsgaard, B. (2014). Morphological and spatio-temporal mismatches shape a neotropical savanna plant-hummingbird network. Biotropica 46, 740747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MMA (2022). Lista Nacional Oficial de Espécies da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção [List of Threatened Animals from Brazil]. MMA Ordinance 148.Google Scholar
Porzio, N.S., Repenning, M. and Fontana, C.S. (2019). Evolution of beak size and song constraints in Neotropical seedeaters (Thraupidae: Sporophila). Acta Ornithologica 53, 173180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repenning, M. and Fontana, C.S. (2016). Breeding biology of the Tropeiro Seedeater (Sporophila beltoni). The Auk 133, 484496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repenning, M. and Fontana, C.S. (2019). Nesting information for Tropeiro Seedeater (Sporophila beltoni), an endemic songbird from southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 27, 164168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolim, R.G., Rosenfield, M.F. and Overbeck, G.E. (2022). Are we ready to restore South Brazilian grasslands? Plant material and legal requirements for restoration and plant production. Acta Botanica Brasilica 36, e2021abb0155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovedder, C.E. and Fontana, C.S. (2012). Nest, eggs, and nest placement of the Brazilian endemic Black-bellied Seedeater (Sporophila melanogaster). The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124, 173176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEMA/RS (2014). Lista Vermelha da Fauna Silvestre Ameaçada de Extinção no Rio Grande do Sul [List of Threatened Animals from the State of Rio Grande do Sul]. SEMA State Decree 51.797.Google Scholar
Serafini, P.P., Martins-Ferreira, C., Bencke, G.A., Fontana, C.S., Dias, R.A., Repenning, M. et al. (2013). Plano de Ação Nacional para a Conservação dos Passeriformes Ameaçados dos Campos Sulinos e Espinilho [Action Plan for Conservation of Threatened Passerines from Campos Sulinos and Espinilho]. Brasília: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio.Google Scholar
Silva, J.M. (1999). Seasonal movements and conservation of seedeaters of the genus Sporophila in South America. Studies in Avian Biology 19, 272280.Google Scholar
Silva, T.W. and Fontana, C.S. (2020). Success of active restoration in grasslands: a case study of birds in southern Brazil. Restoration Ecology 28, 512518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonne, J., Vizentin-Bugoni, J., Maruyama, P.K., Araujo, A.C., Chávez-González, E., Coelho, A.G. et al. (2020). Ecological mechanisms explaining interactions within plant–hummingbird networks: morphological matching increases towards lower latitudes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 287, 20192873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P.A., Overbeck, G.E., Dutra-Silva, R., Porto, A.B., Rolim, R.G., Minervini-Silva, G.H. et al. (2023). Ecological restoration of Campos Sulinos grasslands. In South Brazilian Grasslands: Ecology and Conservation of the Campos Sulinos. Cham: Springer, pp. 529552.Google Scholar
Turbek, S.P., Browne, M., Di Giacomo, A.S., Kopuchian, C., Hochachka, W.M., Estalles, C. et al. (2021). Rapid speciation via the evolution of pre-mating isolation in the Iberá Seedeater. Science 371, eabc0256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed