Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:37:16.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-assembling objects: a new look at the L2 acquisition of pronominal clitics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

ELENA SHIMANSKAYA  and
ROUMYANA SLABAKOVA
ELENA SHIMANSKAYA*
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
ROUMYANA SLABAKOVA
Affiliation:
The University of Southampton University of Iowa
*
Address for correspondence: Elena Shimanskaya, Department of World Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics, 217D Chitwood Hall, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We test the predictions of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (FRH) as applied to the L2 acquisition of French pronominal clitics by Anglophone learners, capitalizing on the fact that different semantic and morphosyntactic features are lexically encoded by French and English pronouns. A picture selection task and a self-paced reading task examine how the information encoded in the L2 forms affects off-line and on-line pronoun interpretation. Our findings suggest that the initial L1–L2 mapping was indeed influenced by the L1. Nevertheless, L2 learners successfully reassembled features into L2 bundles, as evidenced by target-like off-line performance. L2 reading time patterns, however, indicate that L1 representations may have a longer-lasting impact: learners’ reactions to the mismatching input followed a different pattern and were slightly delayed as compared to native speakers’. These results are in line with the FRH, which conceptualizes L1 influence as the transfer of atomic linguistic features and their combinations.

Keywords

Frenchobject cliticslanguage processingfeature reassemblyacquisition of morphosyntax
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 512 - 529
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank Amandine Lorente-Lapole, Ellenor Shoemaker, faculty and instructors in the department of French and Italian of the University of Iowa for their help in recruiting the experiment participants. Our appreciation also extends to two anonymous reviewers who helped us strengthen the paper. All remaining shortcomings are our own.

References

Adiv, E. (1984). Language learning strategies: The relationship between L1 operating principles and language transfer in L2 development. In Anderson, R. (ed.), Second Languages: A crosslinguistic perspective, pp. 125–142. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 992–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2013). What Research Can Tell Us About Teaching: The Case of Pronouns and Clitics. In Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom, pp. 17–34. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L. (2003). The L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Liceras, J. (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection, pp. 151–176. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bruhn-Garavito, J., & Montrul, S. (1996). Verb movement and clitic placement in French and Spanish as a second language. In Stringfellow, A., Cahana-Amitay, D., Hughes, E., & Zukowski, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 123–34. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Carminati, M. N. (2005). Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy (Person>Number>Gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua, 115, 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, J., & Slabakova, R. (2014). Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: the case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research, 30, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, M.-H., & Lardiere, D. (2006). The interpretation of wh-in-situ in Korean second language acquisition. In Belletti, A., Bennati, E., Chesi, C., DiDomenico, E., & Ferrari, I. (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2005, pp. 125–133. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2011). Native and non-native processing of short and long agreement dependencies in French. In Armstrong, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. An Introduction, pp. 94–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duffield, N., & White, L. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: Converging methodologies. Second Language Research, 15, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N., White, L., Bruhn De Garavito, J., Montrul, S., & Prévost, P. (2002). Clitic placement in L2 French: evidence from sentence matching. Journal of Linguistics, 38, 487–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2005). Fossilized Second Language Grammars: The Acquisition of Grammatical Gender. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriele, A., Fiorentino, R., & Alemán Bañón, J. (2013). Examining second language development using event-related potentials: a cross-sectional study on the processing of gender and number agreement. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., Ehrlich, M.-F., & Carreiras, M. (1995). Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: New evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, K. H., & Marsden, H. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3 (2), 117–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H.A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1870–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, A., & Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., & Werner, G. A. (2002). Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 16 (4), 562–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granfeldt, J., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Cliticisation in the acquisition of French as L1 and L2. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds.), The Acquisition of French in Different Contexts: Focus on Functional Categories, pp. 333–370. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y., & Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 69–101.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., Dommergues, J.-Y., Cornu, E., & Guillelmon, D. (1994). The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 363–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 29, 503–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 715–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second Language Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J. (2004). Functional categories and the acquisition of object clitics in L2 French. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds.), The Acquisition of French in Different Contexts: Focus on Functional Categories, pp. 207–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, M. L., & Dwivedi, V. D. (1998). Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S. H., & Lardiere, D. (2013). Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research, 29 (1), 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irmen, L., & Knoll, J. (1999). On the use of the grammatical gender of anaphoric pronouns in German. A comparison between Finns and Germans. Sprache & Kognition, 18, 123–135.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gérard, C.-L. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro- and Macrodevelopmental Changes in Language Acquisition and Other Representational Systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2013). Linguistic approaches to second language mophosyntax. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 106–126. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. M. (1985). The value of clitics in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 1, 151–168.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. M., Maxwell, D., Laguardia, B., Fernández, Z., Fernández, R., & Díaz, L. (1997). A longitudinal study of Spanish non-native grammars: beyond parameters. Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish, 1, 99–132.Google Scholar
Liceras, J., Díaz, L., & Mongeon, C. (2000). N-drop and determiners in native and non-native Spanish: More on the role of morphology in the acquisition of syntactic knowledge. In Leow, R. P. & Sanz, C. (eds.), Spanish Applied Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium, pp. 67–96. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L., & Heilenman, L. K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2010). How similar are adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers? Spanish clitics and word order. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. (2003). French-English bilingual children with SLI: How do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaud, C. (2010). On the Nature of Agreement in English-French Acquisition: A Processing Investigation in the Verbal and Nominal Domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, H. van. (1999). Clitics: A state of the art report. In van Riemsdijk, H. (ed.), Language Typology: Clitics in the European Languages, pp. 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rigalleau, F., Caplan, D., & Baudiffier, V. (2004). New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 893–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabourin, L. (2001). L1 effects on the processing of grammatical gender in L2. In Foster-Cohen, S., & Nizegorodcew, A. (eds.), European Second Language Association Yearbook, pp. 159–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. A. (2008). Second language processing: When are first and second laguages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24, 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120, 2022–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, S. (1997). Formes verbales et pronoms objets chez des apprenants adultes de français en milieu naturel. In Martinot, C. (ed.), Actes du Colloque International sur l'Acquisition de la Syntaxe en Langue Maternelle et en Langue Étrangère [Annales littéraires de l'Université de Franche-Comté 631], pp. 273–293. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12, 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage. In Hoekstra, T., & Schwartz, B. D. (eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar: Papers in Honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshops, pp. 317–68. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L., Swain, M., & Dumas, M. (1975). The interlanguage hypothesis extended to children. Language Learning, 25, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Pereyra, J. F., & Carreiras, M. (2007). An ERP study of agreement features in Spanish. Brain Research, 1185, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. P. (2013). Whether to Teach and How to Teach Complex Linguistic Structures in a Second Language. In Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., Marsden, H. (eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom, pp. 187–205. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. D. (1994). Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input Processing in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. (ed.), Processing Instruction. Theory, Research, and Commentary, pp. 5–31. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2012). Input processing. In Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language, pp. 268–281. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Véronique, D. (1989). L'apprentissage du français par des travailleurs arabophones et la genèse des créoles «français». Langage et société, 50, 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (2001). When sex affects syntax: Contextual influences in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 368–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1996). Clitics in L2 French. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 14, 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-MacGregor, M., & Leung, Y. K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wust, V. (2010). L2 French Learners’ Processing of Object Clitics: Data from the Classroom. L2 Journal, 2, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zesiger, P., Zesiger, L. C., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Franck, J., Frauenfelder, U. H., Hamann, C., & Rizzi, L. (2010). The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 571–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1977). On Clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar