Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:35:04.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The phonological preparation unit in spoken word production in a second language*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2015

CHUCHU LI ,
MIN WANG  and
JOSHUA A. DAVIS
CHUCHU LI
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park
MIN WANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park
JOSHUA A. DAVIS
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. Min Wang, 3304C Benjamin Building, Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the phonological preparation unit when planning spoken words with native Chinese speakers who speak English as a Second Language (ESLs). In Experiment 1, native Chinese speakers named pictures in Chinese, and the names shared the same onset, same rhyme, or had nothing systematically in common. No onset effect was shown, suggesting that native Chinese speakers did not use onset as their preparation unit. There was a rhyme interference effect, probably due to lexical competition. In Experiment 2, the same task was conducted in English among Chinese ESLs and native English speakers. Native speakers showed onset facilitation whereas ESLs did not show such an effect until Block 3. ESLs’ phonological preparation unit is likely to be influenced by their native language but with repetition they are able to attend to sub-syllabic units. Both groups showed rhyme interference, possibly as a result of joint lexical and phonological competition.

Keywords

phonological preparation unitlanguage productionsecond language
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Cross-linguistic Priming in Bilinguals: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language Processing, Acquisition and Change , March 2017 , pp. 351 - 366
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported here was supported by the NSF IGERT grant (DGE-0801465) awarded to the University of Maryland. We thank Dr. William Idsardi for his guidance in the process of data analysis.

References

Alario, F.-X., Perre, L., Castel, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2007). The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102 (3), 464–475. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.002 Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M., & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-Form Encoding in Mandarin Chinese as Assessed by the Implicit Priming Task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46 (4), 751–781. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, T.-M., & Chen, J.-Y. (2013). The syllable as the proximate unit in Mandarin Chinese word production: An intrinsic or accidental property of the production system? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20 (1), 154–162. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0326-7 Google Scholar
Chen, X., Xu, F., Nguyen, T.-K., Hong, G., & Wang, Y. (2010). Effects of cross-language transfer on first-language phonological awareness and literacy skills in Chinese children receiving English instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (3), 712–728. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholin, J., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (1), 47–61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.003 Google Scholar
Cisero, C. A., & Royer, J. M. (1995). The Development and Cross-Language Transfer of Phonological Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20 (3), 275–303. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1018 Google Scholar
Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49 (1), 119–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00008-1 Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93 (3), 283–321. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Clark-Chiarelli, N., & Wolf, A. (2004). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness in low-income Spanish and English bilingual preschool children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25 (03), 323–347. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001158 Google Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (3), 453–465. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 Google Scholar
Jacobs, C. L., & Dell, G. S. (2014). “hotdog”, not “hot” “dog”: the phonological planning of compound words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (4), 512–523. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.892144 Google Scholar
Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do Bilinguals Activate Phonological Representations in One or Both of Their Languages When Naming Words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (1), 2–31. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2747 Google Scholar
Kureta, Y., Fushimi, T., Sakuma, N., & Tatsumi, I. F. (2015). Orthographic influences on the word-onset phoneme preparation effect in native Japanese speakers: Evidence from the word-form preparation paradigm. Japanese Psychological Research, n/a–n/a. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12067 Google Scholar
Kureta, Y., Fushimi, T., & Tatsumi, I. F. (2006). The functional unit in phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (5), 1102–1119. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1102 Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (01), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C., Wang, M., & Idsardi, W. (2015). The effect of orthographic form-cuing on the phonological preparation unit in spoken word production. Memory & Cognition, 43 (4), 563–578. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0484-0 Google Scholar
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58 (6), 823–835.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29 (5), 524–545. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90050-A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30 (1), 69–89. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8 Google Scholar
O’Seaghdha, P. G., Chen, J.-Y., & Chen, T.-M. (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115 (2), 282–302. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001 Google Scholar
O’Seaghdha, P. G., & Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26 (1), 57.Google Scholar
Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107 (3), 460–499. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460 Google Scholar
Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53 (2), 91–127. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdonschot, R. G., Kiyama, S., Tamaoka, K., Kinoshita, S., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. O. (2011). The functional unit of Japanese word naming: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37 (6), 1458–1473. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024491 Google Scholar
Verdonschot, R. G., Nakayama, M., Zhang, Q., Tamaoka, K., & Schiller, N. O. (2013). The Proximate Phonological Unit of Chinese-English Bilinguals: Proficiency Matters. PLoS ONE, 8 (4), e61454. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061454 Google Scholar
Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97 (1), 67–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.001 Google Scholar
You, W., Zhang, Q., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2012). Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PloS One, 7 (10), e46595.Google Scholar