Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:30:52.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization in bilingual language use*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2013

RAKESH M. BHATT*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana–[email protected]

Extract

Pieter Muysken's keynote paper, “Language contact outcomes as a result of bilingual optimization strategies”, undertakes an ambitious project to theoretically unify different empirical outcomes of language contact, for instance, SLA, pidgins and Creoles, and code-switching. Muysken has dedicated a life-time to researching, rather successfully, various sub-fields of language contact, so I am very pleased to see him develop a synergistic model that reduces the complexities of different bilingual contact phenomena to four optimization strategies, the specific permutations of which yield the different, linguistically significant, generalizations. Such attempts are necessary, certainly, if the field of language contact has to make progress, theoretically. The success of such a theoretical unification, however, depends to a large extent on (i) the empirical mileage such unification receives; (ii) how well the assumptions underlying the logic of unification are theoretically motivated, to yield precise predictions about the orderliness of bilingual behavior; and (iii) the conceptual clarity required to understand the various links among the outcomes of language contact. On all these counts, Muysken's paper comes close to achieving success, though one notices several areas of fuzziness that need to be addressed for a competent model to fully emerge. In this short essay, I will point out two areas that need theoretical attention so that subsequent revisions of the present version of the model can address them. I will restrict my comments to code-switching, an extremely productive area of language contact, with which I am most familiar.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

My thanks to Agnes Bolonyai and Carmen Silva-Corvalán for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of this essay. The standard disclaimers apply.

References

Bhatt, R. M. (1997). Code-switching, constraints, and optimal grammars. Lingua, 102, 233251.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. M. (2000). Optimal expressions in Indian English. English Language and Linguistics, 4, 6995.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. M., & Bolonyai, A. (2011). Code-switching and the optimal grammar of bilingual language use. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 522546.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar