Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:23:52.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ontogenesis Model: How do multiword units fit in, and are most lexical representations in the L1 really at their optima?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2021

Henrik Gyllstad Open the ORCID record for Henrik Gyllstad [Opens in a new window]
Henrik Gyllstad*
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: Henrik Gyllstad, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 216 - 217
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021) Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000250Google Scholar
Ecke, P (2015) Parasitic vocabulary acquisition, cross-linguistic influence, and lexical retrieval in multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 145–162.10.1017/S1366728913000722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H (2007) Testing English collocations: Developing tests for use with advanced Swedish learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Gyllstad, H and Suhonen, L (2017) Is attrition a type of learning? Modelling change in the multilingual mental lexicon. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 700–703.10.1075/lab.00008.gylCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, JH (2015) Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A and Pellicer-Sánchez, A (eds) (2019) Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315206615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhonen, L (2020) Snakes and ladders: Developmental aspects of lexical-conceptual relationships in the multilingual mental lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Wray, A (2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772CrossRefGoogle Scholar