Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:30:48.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Navigating conflicting phonotactic constraints in bilingual speech perception*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2015

MATTHEW T. CARLSON ,
MATTHEW GOLDRICK ,
MICHAEL BLASINGAME  and
ANGELA FINK
MATTHEW T. CARLSON*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
MATTHEW GOLDRICK
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
MICHAEL BLASINGAME
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
ANGELA FINK
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
Address for correspondence: Matthew T. Carlson, Department of Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Burrowes Bldg. University Park, PA 16802[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Word-initial /s/-consonant clusters do not occur in Spanish. Confronted with such sequences (e.g., in loanwords), Spanish speakers tend to perceive an illusory initial /e/, ‘repairing’ the illicit sequence. In two experiments, both conducted in Spanish with Spanish-sounding nonwords, we ask whether knowledge of English, which has no restriction against this sound sequence, weakens this pattern of perceptual repair in fluent Spanish–English bilinguals, and whether the effects of English depend on language dominance. In both identification and discrimination tasks, bilinguals exhibited weaker perceptual repair effects relative to Spanish monolinguals. This was true even for bilinguals dominant in Spanish, though the weakening was more pronounced for English-dominant bilinguals. These results show that conflicting phonotactic systems can jointly influence bilinguals’ perceptual repair of the acoustic signal in the more restrictive language, even when it is the bilingual's dominant language, suggesting a degree of integration and mutual influence of knowledge between both their languages.

Keywords

phonotacticsbilingualismspeech perceptionperceptual repaircrosslinguistic influence
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , November 2016 , pp. 939 - 954
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Angela Bennett, Jennifer Ponce, Kyra Krass and Alex McAllister for their help collecting data, and the Northwestern SoundLab for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was conducted with support of NSF grants BCS0846147 and BCS1344269.

References

Altenberg, E. P., & Cairns, H. S. (1983). The effects of phonotactic constraints on lexical processing in bilingual and monolingual subjects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (2), 174–188. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90134-2 Google Scholar
Anisfeld, M., Anisfeld, E., & Semogas, R. (1969). Cross-influences between the phonological systems of Lithuanian-English bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8 (2), 257–261. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80072-1 Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 558–570. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balukas, C., & Koops, C. (2014). Spanish–English bilingual voice onset time in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1367006913516035. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913516035 Google Scholar
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (Version R package version 1.1-6). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 Google Scholar
Berent, I., Lennertz, T., & Rosselli, M. (2012). Universal linguistic pressures and their solutions: Evidence from Spanish. The Mental Lexicon, 7 (3), 275–305. http://doi.org/10.1075/ml.7.3.02ber Google Scholar
Berent, I., Steriade, D., Lennertz, T., & Vaknin, V. (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition, 104 (3), 591–630. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.015 Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realistic perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research (pp. 171–206). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (4), 977–990.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Zurif, E. B. (1974). Bilingual switching: The phonological level. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 28 (3), 310–318.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. T., & Gerfen, C. (2011). Spanish diphthongizing stems: Productivity, processing, and the shaping of the lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 6 (3), 351–373.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. (in press). Bilingual perceptual benefits of experience with a heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000261 Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40 (2), 249–268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41 (6), 520–533. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.006 Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., & Mishler, A. (2012). Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132 (4), 2700–2710. http://doi.org/10.1121/1.4747615 Google Scholar
Cohen, S. P., Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1967). The comparative skills of monolinguals and bilinguals in perceiving phoneme sequences. Lanugage and Speech, 10 (3), 159–168.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research, 7 (2), 103–117.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1992). Evidence for Multicompetence. Language Learning, 42 (4), 557–591.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1995). Multi-competence and the learning of many languages. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 8 (2), 93–98.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., Hallé, P. A., Domínguez, A., & Segui, J. (2011). Perception of prothetic /e/ in #sC utterances: Gating data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 540–543).Google Scholar
Cuetos Vega, F., Glez Nosti, M., Barbón Gutiérrez, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica: Revista de Metodología Y Psicología Experimental, 32 (2), 133–143.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. (2011). Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37 (1), 270–282.Google Scholar
Davidson, L., & Shaw, J. A. (2012). Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 234–248.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (6), 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A Destressing “Deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36 (3), 406–421. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y., & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from? Journal of Memory and Language 64 (3), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114 (2), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106 (2), 682–706.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Schiller, N. O. & Meyer, A. S. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. E., Peña, E. D., Davis, B. L., & Kester, E. S. (2009). Effects on L1 during early acquisition of L2: Speech changes in Spanish at first English contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 (02), 259–272.Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., Runnqvist, E., & Costa, A. (2014). Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science, 25, 1031–1036. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613520014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzales, K., & Lotto, A. J. (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ pseudoword identifications support language-specific phonetic systems. Psychological Science, 24, 2135–2142. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486485 Google Scholar
Gustafson, E., Engstler, C., & Goldrick, M. (2013). Phonetic processing of non-native speech in semantic vs. non-semantic tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, EL506–EL512.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Dominguez, A., Cuetos, F., & Segui, J. (2008). Phonological mediation in visual masked priming: Evidence from phonotactic repair. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 177–192.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Cheng, A., & Carlson, M. T. (2006). Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 220–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, N. (2013). Acoustic differences between lexical and epenthetic vowels in Lebanese Arabic. Journal of Phonetics, 41 (2), 133–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.001 Google Scholar
Hanulíková, A., Mitterer, H., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). Effects of first and second language on segmentation of non-native speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (4), 506–521.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Howell, P., & Dworzynski, K. (2001). Strength of German accent under altered auditory feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 501–513.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850–11857.Google Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S. (2012). Looking into Bilingualism through the heritage speaker's mind. Retrieved from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/12858 Google Scholar
Lentz, T. O., & Kager, R. W. J. (2014). Categorical phonotactic knowledge filters second language input, but probabilistic phonotactic knowledge can still be acquired. Language and Speech, 0023830914559572. http://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914559572 Google Scholar
Li, P., Zhang, F., Tsai, E., & Puls, B. (2014). Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (03), 673–680. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000606 Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 940–967. http://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., & Holt, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (8), 363–369.Google Scholar
Mora, J. C., & Nadeu, M. (2012). L2 effects on the perception and production of a native vowel contrast in early bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16 (4), 484–500. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911429518 Google Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, D. J. (2013). Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics, 41 (6), 407–420. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.07.005 Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64 (3), B9–B17. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00030-9 Google Scholar
Parlato-Oliveira, E., Christophe, A., Hirose, Y., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Plasticity of illusory vowel perception in Brazilian-Japanese bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 3738–3848. http://doi.org/10.1121/1.3327792 Google Scholar
Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA. (n.d.). E-Prime (Version 2.0). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25 (4), 421–436. http://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0051 Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2002). Building phonotactic knowledge in bilinguals: Role of early exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28 (4), 974–989.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch, L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52 (2), 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119 (1), 597–607.Google Scholar
Wilson, C., Davidson, L., & Martin, S. (2014). Effects of acoustic–phonetic detail on cross-language speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 77, 1–24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.08.001 Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1996). Batería Woodcock – Muñoz Pruebas de Aprovechamiento – Revisada. Chicago, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar