Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:05:06.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological priming in bilingualism research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

GUNNAR JACOB
GUNNAR JACOB*
Affiliation:
Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany
*
Address for correspondence: Gunnar Jacob, University of Potsdam, Haus 2, Campus Golm, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476Potsdam, Germany[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The review describes how morphological priming can be utilised to study the processing of morphologically complex words in bilinguals. The article starts with an overview of established experimental paradigms based on morphological priming, discusses a number of basic methodological pitfalls with regard to experimental design and materials, then reviews previous L2 morphological priming studies, and concludes with a brief discussion of recent developments in the field as well as possible future directions.

Keywords

L2 processingmorphologydecompositionmorphological priming
Type
Review Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 443 - 447
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*The research reported in this manuscript was supported by a Humboldt professorship grant to Harald Clahsen and the Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism.

References

Baayen, H. R. (2007). Storage and computation in the mental lexicon. In: Jarema, G., & Libben, G. (Eds.), The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives, Elsevier, 81–104.Google Scholar
Basnight-Brown, D. M., Chen, L., Hua, S., Kostić, A., & Feldman, L. B. (2007). Monolingual and Bilingual Recognition of Regular and Irregular English Verbs: Sensitivity to Form Similarity Varies with First Language Experience. Journal of memory and language, 57 (1): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., & Neubauer, K. (2010). Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and nonnative speakers. Lingua, 120, 2627–2637.Google Scholar
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2014). Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000200.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., Willems, R. M., & Schriefers, H. (2014). L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:802. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00802Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J.A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Filipović Đurđević, D., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and nonnative speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135.Google Scholar
Foote, R. (2015). The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2015, 1–33.Google Scholar
Gor, K., & Cook, S. (2010). Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60.1, 88–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., & Jackson, S. (2013). Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28.7, 1065–1091.Google Scholar
Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H. (2015). Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., Heyer, V., & Veríssimo, J. (2017). Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916688333Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Fleischhauer, E., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Allomorphy and affixation in morphological processing: A cross-modal priming study with late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 924–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., & Kırkıcı, B. (2016). The processing of morphologically complex words in a specific speaker group: A masked-priming study with Turkish heritage speakers. The Mental Lexicon, 11, 2, 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kırkıcı, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–794.Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In: Gaskel, G. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). “Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning.” Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 (3), 394–421.Google Scholar
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C. M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.Google Scholar
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403–435.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. D., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raveh, M., & Rueckl, J. G. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long- term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 103–119.Google Scholar
Rueckl, J. G., & Aicher, K.A. (2008). Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 972–1001.Google Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260.Google Scholar
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18 (4), 399–412.Google Scholar
Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon, 1:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voga, M., Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, A., & Giraudo, H. (2014). Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investigationes 37, 338–352.Google Scholar