Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:38:47.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

MONIKA S. SCHMID  and
SCOTT JARVIS
MONIKA S. SCHMID*
Affiliation:
University of Essex/University of Groningen
SCOTT JARVIS
Affiliation:
Ohio University
*
Address for correspondence: Monika S. Schmid, Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation of lexical first language (L1) attrition, asking how a decrease in lexical accessibility manifests itself in long-term residents in a second language (L2) environment. We question the measures typically used in attrition studies (formal tasks and type–token ratios) and argue for an in-depth analysis of free spoken data, including factors such as lexical frequency and distributional measures. The study is based on controlled, elicited and free data from two populations of attriters of L1 German (L2 Dutch and English) and a control population (n = 53 in each group). Group comparisons and a Discriminant Analysis show that lexical diversity, sophistication and the distribution of items across the text in free speech are better predictors of group membership than formal tasks or elicited narratives. Extralinguistic factors, such as frequency of exposure and use or length of residence, have no predictive power for our results.

Keywords

language attritionlexical attritionmental lexiconmethodology
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 729 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors are particularly grateful for the kind help of Franck Bodmer Mory of the Institut für deutsche Sprache at Mannheim for assessing the frequency of the lemmas from our study against the COSMAS II Corpus.

References

Ammerlaan, T. (1996). You get a bit wobbly. Exploring bilingual lexical retrieval processes in the context of first language attrition. Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In Lambert, R. D. & Freed, B. F. (eds.), The loss of language skills, pp. 83–118. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Berthele, R. (2011). On abduction in receptive multilingualism. Evidence from cognate guessing tasks. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 191–220.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds), Handbook of bilingualism, pp. 417–432. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, A., & Jost, L. (in press). Diversity analysis. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Cherciov, M. (2011). Between attrition and acquisition: The case of Romanian in Immigrant contexts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B., Dannenburg, L., & van Hell, J. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 600–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leeuw, E., Schmid, M. S., & Mennen, I. (2010). Perception of foreign accent in native speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 33–40.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 179–201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dostert, S. (2009). Multilingualism, L1 attrition and the concept of ‘native speaker’. Ph.D. dissertation, Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar
Huberty, C. J., & Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and Discriminant Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hulsen, M. (2000). Language loss and language processing: Three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 57–84.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2009). Lexical transfer. In Pavlenko, A. (ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon, pp. 99–124. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2012). Lexical challenges in the intersection of applied linguistics and ANLP. In Boonthum-Denecke, C., McCarthy, P. M. & Lamkin, T. (eds.), Cross-disciplinary advances in applied natural language processing: Issues and approaches, pp. 50–72. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2013a). Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning, 63 (supplement 1), 87–106.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2013b). Defining and measuring lexical diversity. In Jarvis, S. & Daller, M. (eds.), pp. 13–44.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Daller, M. (eds.) (2013). Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Keijzer, M. (2007). First language attrition: A crosslinguistic investigation of Jakobson's regression hypothesis. Ph.D. dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Köpke, B., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2001). First language attrition in production skills and metalinguistic abilities in German–English and German–French bilinguals. In Ammerlaan, T., Hulsen, M., Strating, H. & Yağmur, K. (eds.), Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives on maintenance and loss of minority languages, pp. 221–234. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Köpke, B., & Schmid, M. S. (2004). First language attrition: The next phase. In Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M. & Weilemar, L. (eds.), pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Köpke, B., Schmid, M., Keijzer, M., & Dostert, S. (eds.) (2007). Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second language learning. Psychological Science, 20, 1507–1515.Google Scholar
Mägiste, E. (1979). The competing language systems of the multilingual: A developmental study of decoding and encoding processes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). VOCD: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, 24, 459–488.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2013). From intrinsic to extrinsic issues of lexical diversity assessment: An ecological validation study. In Jarvis, S. & Daller, M. (eds.), pp. 45–78.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opitz, C. (2011). First language attrition and second language acquisition in a second-language environment. Ph.D. dissertation, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1993). Linguistic, psycholinguistic, and neurolinguistic aspects of interference in bilingual speakers: The activation threshold hypothesis. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9, 133–145.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2007). L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. In Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M. & Dostert, S. (eds.), pp. 121–134.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (1993). Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1969). An introduction to mathematical ecology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2004). First language attrition: The methodology revised. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 239–255.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2007). The role of L1 use for L1 attrition In Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M. & Weilemar, L. (eds.), pp. 135–153.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2011). Language attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Beers Fägersten, K. (2010). Fluency and language attrition. Language Learning 60, 753–791.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Dusseldorp, E. (2010). Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition. Second Language Research 26, 125–160.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Köpke, B. (2007). Bilingualism and attrition. In Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M. & Dostert, S. (eds.), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L. (2004). First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., Verspoor, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Coding and extracting data. In Verspoor, M., Lowie, W. & de Bot, K. (eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques, pp 39–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (1991). Does advanced skill in a second language reduce automaticity in the first language? Language Learning, 41, 59–83.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
Smith, B., & Wilson, J. B. (1996). A consumer's guide to evenness indices. Oikos, 76, 70–82.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In Cornips, L. & Corrigan, K. P. (eds.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological and the social, pp. 55–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd edn). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. (2007). First language attrition from a minimalist perspective: Interface vulnerability and processing effects. In Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M. & Dostert, S. (eds.), pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Varga, Z. (2012). First language attrition and maintenance among Hungarian speakers in Denmark. Ph.D. dissertation, Århus University.Google Scholar
Waas, M. (1996). Language attrition downunder. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Yağmur, K. (1997). First language attrition among Turkish speakers in Sydney. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, G., & Schmid, M. S. (2012). L1 lexical accessibility among Turkish–Dutch bilinguals. The Mental Lexicon, 7, 249–274.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Schmid and Jarvis Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Schmid and Jarvis Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 312.7 KB