Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:34:30.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2013

JULIE MERCIER ,
IRINA PIVNEVA  and
DEBRA TITONE
JULIE MERCIER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, McGill University
IRINA PIVNEVA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, McGill University
DEBRA TITONE*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, McGill University
*
Address for correspondence: Debra Titone, Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Ave., Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1, Canada[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated whether individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word recognition. While their eye movements were monitored, native English and native French English–French bilinguals listened to English words (e.g., field) and looked at pictures corresponding to the target, a within-language competitor (feet), a French cross-language competitor (fille “girl”), or both, and unrelated filler pictures. We derived cognitive and oculomotor inhibitory control measures from a battery of inhibitory control tasks. Increased cognitive inhibitory control was linked to less within-language competition for all bilinguals, and less cross-language competition for native French low-English-exposure bilinguals. Increased oculomotor inhibitory control was linked to less within-language competition for all native French bilinguals, and less cross-language competition for native French low-English-exposure bilinguals. The results extend previous findings (Blumenfeld & Marian, 2011), and suggest that individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing.

Keywords

spoken word recognitionbilingualisminhibitory controlindividual differencesvisual world
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 89 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by an NSERC Discovery Award (Titone). The authors gratefully acknowledge additional support from a Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) Doctoral Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Mercier), a Frederick Banting and Charles Best CGS, Master's Award from the CIHR (Pivneva), and the Canada Research Chairs Program (Titone). The authors are also grateful to Mohsen Akbari, Ashley Benatar, Françoise Brosseau-Lapré, Stéphane Coulombe Bisson, Matthieu Couturier, Dr. Corinne Haigh, Emily Quinan, and Karen Jarboe Singletary. Grateful thanks to anonymous reviewers who helped revise a previous version of the manuscript.

References

Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439.Google Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137, 190–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don't: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In Henderson & Ferreira (eds.), pp. 347–386.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M. (2007). Linear mixed model implementation in lme4. Ms., University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: Standing at the crossroads. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, pp. 171–204. Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, J. F. & de, A. M. B. Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 417–432. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Freedman, M. (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45, 459–464.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. [M.], Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. [I. M.], & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. [M.], & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1341–1354.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2007). Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2011). Competition dynamics of second-language listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K. (2010). Carpet or Cárcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 669–705.Google Scholar
Chertkow, H., Whitehead, V., Phillips, N., Wolfson, C., Atherton, J., & Bergman, H. (2010). Multilingualism (but not always bilingualism) delays the onset of Alzheimer disease: Evidence from a bilingual community. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 24, 118–125.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113, 135–149.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. [M.], Bialystok, E., & Freedman, M. (2010). Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease: bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology, 75 (19), 1726–1729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269–284.Google Scholar
Dahan, D., & Gaskell, G. (2007). The temporal dynamics of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 483–501.Google Scholar
Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time-course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317–367.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 397–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003). Lexical competition in phonological priming: Assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1271–1283.Google Scholar
Egner, T. (2011). Right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex mediates individual differences in conflict-driven cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3903–3913.Google Scholar
Fischer, B. (1992). Saccadic reaction time: Implications for reading, dyslexia and visual cognition. In Rayner (ed.), pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
Gadsby, N., Arnott, W. L., & Copland, D. A. (2008). An investigation of working memory influences on lexical ambiguity resolution. Neuropsychology, 22, 209–216.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245–262.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Salmon, D. P., Montoya, R. I., & Galasko, D. R. (2011). Degree of bilingualism predicts age of diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in low-education but not in highly educated Hispanics. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3826–3830.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: The behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267–283.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Transfer and language mode. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 175–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, pp. 1–22. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2008). Part IV – Spoken word recognition in bilinguals. In Grosjean, F. (ed.), Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279–1296.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and scene perception. In Rayner (ed.), pp. 260–283.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (eds.) (2004). The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196–208.Google Scholar
Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Moser-Mercer, B., & Golestani, N. (2011). Executive control of language in the bilingual brain: Integrating the evidence from neuroimaging to neuropsychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 18, 625–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, D. E. (2004). Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing. In Henderson & Ferreira (eds.), pp. 105–134.Google Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314–318.Google Scholar
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N. A. (2012). Ageing and bilingualism: Absence of a “bilingual advantage” in Stroop interference in a nonimmigrant sample. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 356–369.Google Scholar
Krizman, J., Marian, V., Shook, A., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201575109. Published online April 30, 2012.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. (2008). Juggling two languages in one mind. Psychological Science Agenda, American Psychological Association, 22. http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2008/01/kroll.aspx (accessed February 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Gollan, T. H. (in press). Speech planning in two languages: What bilinguals tell us about language production. In Ferreira, V., Goldrick, M. & Miozzo, M. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of language production. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). Eye movements and the roles of vision in activities of daily living: Marking a cup of tea. Perception, 28, 1311–1328.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Banich, M. T., Jacobson, B. L., & Tanabe, J. L. (2004). Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 22, 1097–1106.Google Scholar
Luce, P., & Pisoni, D. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Anderson, J., Craik, F. [I. M.], Bialystok, E., & Grady, C. (2010). Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition, 74, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luk, G., De Sa, E., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588–595.Google Scholar
Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31, 133–156.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, K. H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Proficiency and Experience Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing, 50, 940–967.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003a). Comparing bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 173–193.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. [J.], (2003b). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 6, 97–115.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Spivey, M. [J.], & Hirsh, J. (2003). Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence. Brain and Language, 86, 70–82.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.Google Scholar
Matin, E., Shao, K., & Boff, K. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2001). Spoken word access processes: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melcher, T., & Gruber, O. (2009). Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study. Cortex, 45, 189–200.Google Scholar
Mercier, J., Sudarshan, A., Pivneva, I., Baum, S., & Titone, D. (2013). Spoken word processing in bilingual older adults. Ms., McGill University.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working-memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 175–202.Google Scholar
Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218–228.Google Scholar
Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234.Google Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209–1228.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2001). An integrated neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism (1976–2000). Presented at the LACUS Forum 27, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. (2013). Inhibitory control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Ms., McGill University.Google Scholar
Pivneva, I., Palmer, C., & Titone, D. (2012). Inhibitory control and l2 proficiency modulate bilingual language production: Evidence from spontaneous monologue and dialogue speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 57.Google Scholar
Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2013). What the eyes tell us about bilingual language production and its link to inhibitory control. Ms., McGill University.Google Scholar
Prabhakaran, R., Blumstein, S. E., Myers, E. B., Hutchison, E., & Britton, B. (2006). An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological–lexical competition. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2209–2221.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org./Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (ed.) (1992). Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Righi, G., Blumstein, S. E., Mertus, J., & Worden, M. S. (2010). Neural systems underlying lexical competition: An eye tracking and fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 213–224.Google Scholar
Salverda, A. P., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). A goalbased perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137, 172–180.Google Scholar
Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., & McDonough, J. (2007). Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition. Cognition, 105, 466–476.Google Scholar
Saslow, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1030–1033.Google Scholar
Schweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: Evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 48, 991–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S. (2005). Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention-shifting and second language proficiency. Memory & Cognition, 33, 644–653.Google Scholar
Shook, A., & Marian, V.The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728912000466. Published online by Cambridge University Press, September 5, 2012.Google Scholar
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, L. M., & Hamburger, M. B. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239–1250.Google Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281–284.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1995). Cross-language studies of speech perception: A historical review. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience, pp. 3–48. Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). Spoken language comprehension: Insights from eye movements. In Gaskell, G. (eds.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, pp. 309–326. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information is spoken-language comprehension. Science, 268 (5217), 1632–1634.Google Scholar
Titone, D., & Levy, D. (2004). Lexical competition and spoken word identification in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 68, 75–85.Google Scholar
Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412–1431.Google Scholar
Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 174.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780–789.Google Scholar
Wagner, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2004). Determining inhibition: Individual differences in the ‘lexicon context’ trade-off during lexical ambiguity resolution in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 51, 290–299.Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2012). Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 73–80.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2010). Investigating bilingual processing: The neglected role of language processing contexts. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 1, 178.Google Scholar
Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2008). Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 592–612.Google Scholar
Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1–14.Google Scholar