Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Foucart, Alice
and
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl
2012.
Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 1,
p.
226.
Grüter, Theres
Lew-Williams, Casey
and
Fernald, Anne
2012.
Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem?.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Kroll, Judith F.
and
Dussias, Paola E.
2012.
The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism.
p.
216.
TANNER, DARREN
MCLAUGHLIN, JUDITH
HERSCHENSOHN, JULIA
and
OSTERHOUT, LEE
2013.
Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
367.
Martin, Clara D.
Thierry, Guillaume
Kuipers, Jan-Rouke
Boutonnet, Bastien
Foucart, Alice
and
Costa, Albert
2013.
Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 4,
p.
574.
Hopp, Holger
2013.
Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Batterink, Laura
and
Neville, Helen
2013.
Implicit and Explicit Second Language Training Recruit Common Neural Mechanisms for Syntactic Processing.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 6,
p.
936.
Brooks, Patricia J.
and
Kempe, Vera
2013.
Individual differences in adult foreign language learning: The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness.
Memory & Cognition,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 2,
p.
281.
Dussias, Paola E.
Valdés Kroff, Jorge R.
Guzzardo Tamargo, Rosa E.
and
Gerfen, Chip
2013.
WHEN GENDER AND LOOKING GO HAND IN HAND.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
353.
COUGHLIN, CAITLIN E.
and
TREMBLAY, ANNIE
2013.
Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing.
Applied Psycholinguistics,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
615.
Gabriele, Alison
Fiorentino, Robert
and
Bañón, José Alemán
2013.
Examining second language development using event-related potentials.
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
p.
213.
PLIATSIKAS, CHRISTOS
and
MARINIS, THEODOROS
2013.
Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl
German, Elisa Sneed
and
Foucart, Alice
2014.
Foundations of Bilingual Memory.
p.
237.
Renaud, Claire
2014.
A processing investigation of the accessibility of the uninterpretable gender feature in L2 French and L2 Spanish adjective agreement.
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
222.
MORALES, LUIS
PAOLIERI, DANIELA
CUBELLI, ROBERTO
and
BAJO, M. TERESA
2014.
Transfer of Spanish grammatical gender to English: Evidence from immersed and non-immersed bilinguals.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
700.
Schmid, Monika S.
2014.
The Debate on Maturational Constraints in Bilingual Development: A Perspective from First-Language Attrition.
Language Acquisition,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
386.
Reichle, Robert V.
and
Birdsong, David
2014.
PROCESSING FOCUS STRUCTURE IN L1 AND L2 FRENCH.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
535.
Alptekin, Cem
Erçetin, Gülcan
and
Özemir, Oya
2014.
Effects of Variations in Reading Span Task Design on the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Second Language Reading.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 98,
Issue. 2,
p.
536.
Alemán Bañón, José
Fiorentino, Robert
and
Gabriele, Alison
2014.
Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
275.
Lemhöfer, Kristin
Schriefers, Herbert
and
Indefrey, Peter
2014.
Idiosyncratic Grammars: Syntactic Processing in Second Language Comprehension Uses Subjective Feature Representations.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 7,
p.
1428.