Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:16:18.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender inferences: Grammatical features and their impact on the representation of gender in bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2013

SAYAKA SATO ,
PASCAL M. GYGAX  and
UTE GABRIEL
SAYAKA SATO*
Affiliation:
University of Fribourg, Switzerland
PASCAL M. GYGAX
Affiliation:
University of Fribourg, Switzerland
UTE GABRIEL
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
*
Address for correspondence: Sayaka Sato, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Rue de Faucigny 2, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the effects of grammatical and stereotypical gender information on the comprehension of human referent role nouns among bilinguals of a grammatical (French) and a natural gender language (English). In a sentence evaluation paradigm, participants judged the acceptability of a gender-specific sentence referring to either a group of women or men following a sentence containing the plural form of a role noun female (e.g., social workers), male (e.g., surgeons) or neutral (e.g., musicians) in stereotypicality. L1 French and L1 English bilinguals were tested both in French and English. The results showed that bilinguals construct mental representations of gender associated with the language of the task they are engaged in, shifting representations as they switch languages. Specifically, in French, representations were male-dominant (i.e., induced by the masculine form), whereas in English, they were stereotype-based. Furthermore, the results showed that the extent to which representations shifted was modulated by participants’ proficiency in their L2, with highly proficient L2 participants resembling native speakers of the L2 and less proficient L2 participants being influenced more by their native language.

Keywords

gender representationgrammatical gendergender stereotypesmasculine formgeneric interpretation
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 792 - 807
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. 237907. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the earlier version of the manuscript.

References

Athanasopoulos, P. (2009). Cognitive representation of colour in bilinguals: The case of Greek blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 83–95.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., Damjanovic, L., Krajciova, A., & Sasaki, M. (2011). Representation of colour concepts in bilingual cognition: The case of Japanese blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 9–17.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Kasai, C. (2008). Language and thought in bilinguals: The case of grammatical number and nonverbal classification preferences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 105–123.Google Scholar
Banaji, M., & Hardin, C. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science,7, 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassetti, B. (2007). Bilingualism and thought: Grammatical gender and concepts of objects in Italian–German bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 251–273.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2011). The grammatical and conceptual gender of animals in second language users. In Cook & Bassettia (eds.), pp. 357–384.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973). Does sex‐biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Gentner & Goldin-Meadow (eds.), pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Brauer, M., & Landry, M. (2008). Un ministre peut-il tomber enceinte? L'impact du générique masculin sur les représentations mentales [Can a secretary of state become pregnant? The impact of the generic masculine on mental representations]. L'année psychologique, 108, 243–272.Google Scholar
Braun, F., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2005). Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings. Communications, 30, 1–21.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. (2008). Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 225–251.Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., Corradini, P., Padovani, R., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Pronoun resolution in Italian: The role of grammatical gender and context. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 416–434.Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Padovani, R. (2007). Further evidence of gender stereotype priming in language: Semantic facilitation and inhibition in Italian role nouns. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 277–293.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 639–663.Google Scholar
Chatard, A., Guimont, S., & Martinot, D. (2005). Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l'auto-efficacité des élèves: une remise en cause de l'universalisme masculin? [Occupational self-efficacy as a function of grammatical gender in French?]. L'Année Psychologique, 105, 249–272.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. R., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. A. (1994). Profiling the advanced language learner: The C-test in British further and higher education. In Grotjahn, R. (ed.), Der C-Test. Theoretische Grundlagen und Praktische Anwendungen [The C-test: Theoretical foundations and practical applications] (vol. 2), pp. 217–237. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. & Bassetti, B. (eds.) (2011). Language and bilingual cognition. New York & Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1283–1296.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 53, 397–428.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M., & Véronique, D. (2001). Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: A cross-sectional study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Brinke, S. T. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51–66.Google Scholar
Duffy, S., & Keir, J. (2004). Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 32, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R. (2006). A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, 23, 290–325.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M. (2001). How a language gender system creeps into perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247.Google Scholar
Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. M. (2008). Can societal language amendments change gender representation? The case of Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 451–457.Google Scholar
Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., Sarrasin, O., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2008). Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 206–212.Google Scholar
Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. New York & Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P. M., & Oakhill, J. (2012). Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics remain men. Discourse Processes, 49, 481–500.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In Britton, B. K. & Graesser, A. C. (eds.), Models of understanding text, pp. 313–339. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Are inferences from stereotyped role name to characters’ gender made elaboratively? Memory & Cognition, 30, 439–446.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.) (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.Google Scholar
Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., & Raatz, U. (2002). C-tests: An overview. In Coleman, J. A., Grotjahn, R. & Raatz, U. (eds.), University language testing and the C-test, pp. 93–114. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gygax, P. M., & Gabriel, U. (2008). Can a group of musicians be composed of women? Generic interpretation of French masculine role names in the absence and presence of feminine forms. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 6, 143–151.Google Scholar
Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2008). Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 464–485.Google Scholar
Hosoda, M., & Stone, D. L. (2000). Current gender stereotypes and their evaluative content. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1283–1294.Google Scholar
Irmen, L. (2007). What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 431–456.Google Scholar
Irmen, L., & Köhncke, A. (1996). Zur Psychologie des “generischen” Maskulinums [On the psychology of the “generic” masculine]. Sprache & Kognition, 15, 152–166.Google Scholar
Irmen, L., & Roßberg, N. (2004). Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and nonlinguistic information on the mental representation of person information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 272–307.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inferences and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein-Braley, C., & Raatz, U. (1984). A survey of research on the C-test1. Language Testing, 1, 134–146.Google Scholar
Kousta, S., Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 843–858.Google Scholar
Kreiner, H., Sturt, P., & Garrod, S. (2008). Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 239–261.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18, 137–171.Google Scholar
Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., & Krogh, H. R. (2002). Language at work: Children's gendered interpretations of occupational titles. Child Development, 73, 810–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Malt, B. C., & Sloman, S. A. (2003). Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 47–67.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., Garnham, A., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information. Memory & Cognition, 33, 972–983.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1997). The cognitive neuropsychology of bilingualism. In de Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives, pp. 15–27. Québec: CIRAL.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (1999). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 209–230.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2011). Thinking and speaking in two languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
QPT [Quick Placement Test]. (2001). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rahimi, M., & Saadat, M. (2005). A verbal protocol analysis of a C-test. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 55–85.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. J., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Evidence of immediate activation of gender information from a social role name. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 886–903.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L. A., & de Haan, G. J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22, 1–29.Google Scholar
Scheutz, M., & Eberhard, K. M. (2004). Effects of morphosyntactic gender features in bilingual language processing. Cognitive Science, 28, 559–588.Google Scholar
Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M. C., Rodríguez, W., & Dubois, D. P. (2002). When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 377–397.Google Scholar
Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 381–398.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, pp. 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Niemeier, S. & Dirven, R. (eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity, pp. 107–138. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner & Goldin-Meadow (eds.), pp. 157–192.Google Scholar
Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S., & Braun, F. (2001). Name your favorite musician. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 464–469.Google Scholar
Stericker, A. (1981). Does this “he” or “she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 7, 637–641.Google Scholar
Vervecken, D., & Hannover, B. (2012). Changing (s)expectations: The influence of teachers’ language use on pupils’ gendered representations of occupations, vocational aspirations, and self-efficacy. Poster presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105–133.Google Scholar
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Reyes, I., Hernandez, A., Gavaldón de Barreto, L., & Bates, E. A., (2005). When zebras become painted donkeys: Grammatical gender and semantic priming interact during picture integration in a spoken Spanish sentence. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 553–587.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.Google Scholar