Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:33:54.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissociating language-switch costs from cue-switch costs in bilingual language switching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2016

KARIN W. HEIKOOP ,
MATHIEU DECLERCK ,
SANDER A. LOS  and
IRING KOCH
KARIN W. HEIKOOP
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychology, VU University Amsterdam Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University
MATHIEU DECLERCK
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Brain & Language Research Institute, Aix-Marseille University
SANDER A. LOS
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychology, VU University Amsterdam
IRING KOCH*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University
*
Address for correspondence: Iring Koch, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstrasse 17–19, D-52056 Aachen, Germany[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cued language switching is used to examine language-control processes by comparing performance in language-switch trials with performance in repetition trials. In 1:1 cue-to-language mappings, language repetitions involve cue repetitions and language switches involve cue switches. Hence, the observed switch costs might reflect cue-switch costs rather than language-related control processes. By introducing a 2:1 cue-to-language mapping, we dissociated language switches (cue and language switched vs. cue switched, but language repeated) and cue switches (repeated language, with vs. without switched cue). We found cue-switch costs, but language-related switch costs were substantial, too, presumably reflecting language-control processes in cued language switching.

Keywords

bilingualismlanguage controllanguage switchingpicture namingcue processing
Type
Research Notes
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , November 2016 , pp. 921 - 927
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2013). Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 568–585. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.792822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192–208. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.137 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M., & Philipp, A. M. (2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1630–1645. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Declerck, M., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2012). Digits vs. pictures: The influence of stimulus-type on language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 896–904. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M., Thoma, A., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2015). Highly proficient bilinguals implement inhibition - Evidence from N-2 repetition costs when switching between three languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 41, 1911–1916. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000138.Google Scholar
Fink, A., & Goldrick, M. (2015). Pervasive benefits of preparation in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 808–814. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0739-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychological Research, 71, 393–400. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0040-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. doi: 10.1017/S1366728998000133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, K., De Baene, W., Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5–14. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1–14. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575.Google ScholarPubMed
Macnamara, J., Krauthammer, M., & Bolgar, M. (1968). Language switching in bilinguals as a function of stimulus and response uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 208–215. doi: 10.1037/h0026390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26. doi: 10.1037//W96-3445.129.L4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362–371. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362.Google ScholarPubMed
Meuter, R. F., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2009). Inhibition in language switching: What is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1187–1195. doi: 10.1037/a0016376.Google ScholarPubMed
Verhoef, K., Roelofs, A., & Chwilla, D. J. (2009). Role of inhibition in language switching: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in overt picture naming. Cognition, 110, 84–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissberger, G. H., Gollan, T. H., Bondi, M. W., Clark, L. R., & Wierenga, C. E. (2015). Language and task switching in the bilingual brain: Bilinguals are staying, not switching, experts. Neuropsychologia, 66, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar