Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:30:47.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bimodal bilingualism: Factors yet to be explored

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2015

GLADYS TANG
GLADYS TANG*
Affiliation:
Centre for Sign Linguistics and Deaf Studies, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Collaborative Innovation Centre for Language Ability, Jiangsu Normal University
*
Address for correspondences: Professor Gladys Tang, Academic Building #2, Centre for Sign Linguistics and Deaf Studies, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent years have seen increasing research into bimodal bilingualism from a variety of paradigms such as bilingual acquisition, language processing, neural systems, and cognitive skills, with the underlying assumption that successful bimodal bilingualism entails the knowledge representations and processing of two grammars each of which via a distinct modality, auditory-oral versus visual-gestural. As such, it opens up an arena of cutting-edge research enabling comparisons of the linguistic and cognitive effects of monolingualism versus bilingualism, as well as unimodal bilingualism versus bimodal bilingualism.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 259 - 260
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donati, C., & Branchini, C. (2013). Challenging linearization: simultaneous mixing in the production of bimodal bilinguals. In Biberauer, T. & Roberts, I. (eds) Challenges to Linearization, pp. 93–128, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Giezen, M. R., & Gollan, T. H. Psycholinguistic, cognitive, and neural implications of bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000085 Google Scholar
Fung, C. (2012). Code-Blending in Early Hong Kong Sign Language: A Case Study. MPhil Dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., de Quarros, R. M., Chen Pichler, D., & F. Zoe. (2014). Language Choice in bimodal bilingual development. Frontiers in Psychology, 20 October 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bogaerde, B., & Baker, A. E. (2005). Code mixing in mother-child interaction in Deaf families. Sign Language and Linguistics, 8, 153–176. doi: 10.1075/sll.8.1-2.08bog.Google Scholar