Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:03:52.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

SUSANNA FLETT ,
HOLLY P. BRANIGAN  and
MARTIN J. PICKERING
SUSANNA FLETT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh
HOLLY P. BRANIGAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh
MARTIN J. PICKERING
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh
*
Address for correspondence: Holly Branigan, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A structural priming experiment investigated whether bilingual speakers’ processing of their non-native language (L2) depends entirely on their experience of L2, or whether it is also affected by their experience of the native language (L1). German-L1 and Spanish-L1 proficient speakers of English (and English-L1 controls) described pictures of dative events after reading unrelated sentences that had a Prepositional Object (PO) or Double Object (DO) structure. Participants in all three groups were more likely to produce DO descriptions after reading DO sentences than PO sentences. Crucially, Spanish-L1 speakers, whose L1 allows PO but not DO structures, showed the same pattern of priming as German-L1 speakers, whose L1 allows both structures. Additionally, the groups showed no difference in their baseline preference for DO structures. We suggest that in proficient bilinguals, processing in L2 is not affected by L1 experience and L1 preferences, and propose a model to account for our findings.

Keywords

syntaxstructural primingstructural preferences
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 751 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by an ESRC studentship awarded to the first author. We also acknowledge the input of the referees.

References

Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931–949.Google ScholarPubMed
Biria, R., Ameri-Golestan, A., & Antón-Méndez, I. (2010). The impact of syntactic priming on English language learners’ production: A transfer study of indirect questions/requests. English Language Teaching, 3, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistent of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, pp. 945–984. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butt, J., & Benjamin, C. (1988). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., Yan, H., & Branigan, H. P. (2011). Lexical and syntactic representations in closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese–Mandarin bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's ‘Speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Grainger, J. (1998). Simulating cross-language competition with the Bilingual Interactive Activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., Bock, K., Wilson, M., & Cohen, N. J. (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19, 940–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2012). Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 568–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In Bower, G. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, pp. 133–177. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language production (vol. 1): Speech and talk, pp. 177–220. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language, 62, 221–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish/English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heydel, M., & Murray, W. S. (2000). Conceptual effects in sentence priming: A cross-linguistic perspective. In De Vincenzi, M. & Lombardo, V. (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing, pp. 227–254. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, L., & Van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual representations. Memory & Cognition, 39, 276–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loebell, H., & Bock, J. K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41, 791–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2010). Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EL learner's production of wh-questions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 817–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, P., & Fox Tree, J. (2003). Building syntactic structures in speaking: A bilingual exploration. Experimental Psychology, 50, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 586–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J, & Ferreira, V. S 2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89, 179–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J., & Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar