Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:38:50.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictors of lexical retrieval in Hindi–English bilingual speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2019

Keerthi Ramanujan  and
Brendan S. Weekes
Keerthi Ramanujan*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Communication Science, The University of Hong Kong
Brendan S. Weekes
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Communication Science, The University of Hong Kong School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne
*
Address for correspondence: Keerthi Ramanujan, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When bilinguals name pictures while in ‘monolingual mode’, we expect that under conditions of language-constraint and no cognate facilitation, factors influencing lexical retrieval in monolinguals ought to exert similar effects on bilinguals. To this end, we carried out a L1-only naming task on early Hindi–English bilinguals. Results of linear mixed effects analysis reveal AoA, Familiarity, Image Agreement and Codability (availability of alternate names) to be the most significant predictors of lexical retrieval speed for early bilinguals, confirming our expectations. However, we report, for the first time, a by-subject variation in Codability for bilinguals. Implications of the results are discussed in the context of current theories of bilingual lexical access and competition. In preparation for this study, Hindi norms from bilinguals for items in the Snodgrass and Vanderwart set have been established, which will be of use for stimuli selection in experimental studies involving bilinguals.

Keywords

bilingualslexical accessnormative dataHindimixed-effects
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 265 - 273
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutalebi, J and Green, DW (2008) Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4), 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alario, FX, Ferrand, L, Laganaro, M, New, B, Frauenfelder, UH and Segui, J (2004) Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc 36(1), 140–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Álvarez, B and Cuetos, F (2007) Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods 39(3), 377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, RH, Davidson, DJ and Bates, DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtiar, M, Nilipour, R and Weekes, BS (2013) Predictors of timed picture naming in Persian. Behavior Research Methods 45(3), 834–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, DJ, Levy, R, Scheepers, C and Tily, HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, C, Morrison, CM and Ellis, AW (1997) Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement. The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology 50A(3), 560–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version 1(7).Google Scholar
Bates, E, D'Amico, S, Jacobsen, T, Székely, A, Andonova, E, Devescovi, A, Herron, D, Lu, C, Pechmann, T and Pléh, C (2003) Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10(2), 344–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E and Viswanathan, M (2009) Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition 112(3), 494–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonin, P, Chalard, M, Méot, A and Fayol, M (2002) The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology 93(1), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boukadi, M, Zouaidi, C and Wilson, MA (2016) Norms for name agreement, familiarity, subjective frequency, and imageability for 348 object names in Tunisian Arabic. Behavior Research Methods 48(2), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clingingsmith, D (2014) Industrialization and Bilingualism in India. Journal of Human Resources 49(1), 73–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A, Miozzo, M and Caramazza, A (1999) Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language 41(3), 365–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A, Caramazza, A and Sebastian-Galles, N (2000) The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(5), 1283.Google ScholarPubMed
Craney, TA and Surles, JG (2002) Model-Dependent Variance Inflation Factor Cutoff Values. Quality Engineering 14(3), 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuetos, F, Ellis, AW and Alvarez, B (1999) Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31(4), 650–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, R, Barbón, A and Cuetos, F (2013) Lexical and semantic age-of-acquisition effects on word naming in Spanish. Memory & Cognition 41(2), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimitropoulou, M, Duñabeitia, JA, Blitsas, P and Carreiras, M (2009) A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: Norms for name agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods 41(2), 584–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, AW and Morrison, CM (1998) Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(2), 515.Google ScholarPubMed
Finkbeiner, M, Gollan, TH and Caramazza, A (2006) Lexical access in bilingual speakers: What's the (hard) problem? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, KI and Forster, JC (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35(1), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, M, Alladi, S, Chertkow, H, Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM, Phillips, NA, Duggirala, V, Raju, SB and Bak, TH (2014) Delaying Onset of Dementia: Are Two Languages Enough? Behavioural Neurology 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, WR (1992) Picture naming. Cognition 42(1-3), 61–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollan, TH and Acenas, L-AR (2004) What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30(1), 246.Google ScholarPubMed
Gollan, TH, Montoya, RI, Cera, C and Sandoval, TC (2008) More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 58(3), 787–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, TH, Montoya, RI, Fennema-Notestine, C and Morris, SK (2005) Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition 33(7), 1220–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DW (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(02), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F (2001) The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J (Ed.). One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, ML (2011) Bilingual picture–word studies constrain theories of lexical selection. Frontiers in psychology 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoshino, N and Kroll, JF (2008) Cognate effects in picture naming: does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition 106(1), 501–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanova, I and Costa, A (2008) Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica 127(2), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izura, C and Ellis, AW (2002) Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages. Psicológica 23(2), 245–281.Google Scholar
Johnson, CJ, Paivio, A and Clark, JM (1996) Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin 120(1), 113–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, B, Treiman, R and Mullennix, J (2002) Phonetic Biases in Voice Key Response Time Measurements. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1), 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RHB (2015) lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models, 2015. URL http://CRAN.R-Project.Org/package=lmerTest.RPackageVersion, 0–2.Google Scholar
La Heij, W (2005) Selection processes in monolingual and bilingual lexical access. Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, WJM (1999) Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(6), 223–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Hao, M, Li, P and Shu, H (2011) Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese. PLoS One 6(1), e16505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V and Spivey, M (2003) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(02), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, CD, Dering, B, Thomas, EM and Thierry, G (2009) Brain potentials reveal semantic priming in both the ‘active'and the ‘non-attended'language of early bilinguals. NeuroImage 47(1), 326–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, CM, Ellis, AW and Quinlan, PT (1992) Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition 20(6), 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nag, S (2014) Alphabetism and the science of reading: from the perspective of the akshara languages. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishimoto, T, Miyawaki, K, Ueda, T, Une, Y and Takahashi, M (2005) Japanese normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research Methods 37(3), 398–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paivio, A, Clark, JM, Digdon, N and Bons, T (1989) Referential processing: reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging. Memory & Cognition 17(2), 163–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Raman, I, Raman, E and Mertan, B (2014) A standardized set of 260 pictures for Turkish: Norms of name and image agreement, age of acquisition, visual complexity, and conceptual familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 46(2), 588–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raman, I, Raman, E, İkier, S, Kilecioğlu, E, Uzun Eroğlu, D and Zeyveli, Ş (2018) Differential effects of age of acquisition and frequency on memory: evidence from free recall of pictures and words in Turkish. Writing Systems Research. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K and Davis, MH (2002) On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 28(2), 307–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, PM, Garcia, LJ, Desrochers, A and Hernandez, D (2002) English performance of proficient bilingual adults on the Boston Naming Test. Aphasiology 16(4-6), 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossion, B and Pourtois, G (2004) Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 33(2), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahgal, A (1991) Patterns of language use in a bilingual setting in India. In Cheshire, J (Ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 299–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severens, E, Van Lommel, S, Ratinckx, E and Hartsuiker, RJ (2005) Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica 119(2), 159–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, JG and Vanderwart, M (1980) A Standardized Set of 260 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity and Visual Complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6(2), 174–215.Google ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, JG and Yuditsky, T (1996) Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28(4), 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaid, J and Gupta, A (2002) Exploring Word Recognition in a Semi-Alphabetic Script: The Case of Devanagari. Brain and Language 81(1-3), 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkovyskaya, E, Raman, I and Baluch, B (2017) Age of acquisition (AoA) effect in monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1)-English (L2) speakers in a free recall task. Writing Systems Research 9(2), 148–163. http://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1405136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weekes, BS, Shu, H, Hao, M, Liu, Y and Tan, LH (2007) Predictors of timed picture naming in Chinese. Behavior Research Methods 39(2), 335–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zevin, JD and Seidenberg, MS (2002) Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN and Elphick, CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ramanujan and Weekes supplementary material

Ramanujan and Weekes supplementary material
Download Ramanujan and Weekes supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 426.6 KB