Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:23:02.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogenenis model of L2 lexical representation: Cross-language links to account for bilingual lexical processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2021

Janet G. van Hell Open the ORCID record for Janet G. van Hell [Opens in a new window]
Janet G. van Hell*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, U.S.A.
*
Address for correspondence: Janet G. van Hell, Department of Psychology 414 Moore Building Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 USA Phone: 814-867-2337 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

cross-language interactionlanguage nonselective activationlexical processingbilingual mental lexicon
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 232 - 233
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021) Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000250Google Scholar
De Groot, AMB (1992) Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Frost, R and Katz, L (eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers pp. 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, A and Van Heuven, WJB (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T, Wahl, A, Buytenhuijs, F, van Halem, N, Al-Jibouri, Z, De Korte, M and Rekké, S (2019) Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, JF, Bobb, SC and Wodniecka, Z (2006) Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, JF and Stewart, E (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, JG and De Groot, AMB (1998) Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, JG and Tanner, D (2012) Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation. Language Learning 62, 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00710.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar