Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:57:05.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wellbeing measures of mortality risks: life-cycle contradictions and ordinal index challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2020

W. KIP VISCUSI
W. KIP VISCUSI*
Affiliation:
University Distinguished Professor of Law, Economics, and Management, Vanderbilt Law School, Nashville, TN, USA
*
*Correspondence to: Vanderbilt Law School, 131 21st Ave. South, Nashville, TN37203, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The value of a statistical life (VSL) monetizes the expected loss in wellbeing associated with the risk of death. The utility loss resulting from a fatality is central to the empirical framework for estimating the VSL. The VSL trajectory over the life cycle exhibits an inverted-U shape, following a trajectory similar to that of lifetime patterns of consumption. The U-shaped pattern displayed by happiness measures over the life cycle is the opposite of the inverted-U shape pattern displayed by the VSL. It is consequently inappropriate to use happiness measures as ordinal ranking substitutes for the VSL for the purposes of estimating the benefits of mortality risk reduction. Compared to ordinal wellbeing scales, the VSL also offers a variety of additional capabilities by providing a cardinal index of the unit benefits for changes in mortality risks.

Type
Articles
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 4 , Special Issue 2: On Happiness Being the Goal of Government , July 2020 , pp. 245 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldy, J. (2019), ‘Bird of a feather: Estimating the value of statistical life from dual-earner families’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 58(2/3): 187–205.10.1007/s11166-019-09303-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldy, J. and Viscusi, W.K. (2008), ‘Adjusting the value of a statistical life for age and cohort effects’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3): 573–581.10.1162/rest.90.3.573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A.J. (2008), ‘Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66(8): 1733–1749.10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frijters, P. and Beatton, T. (2012), ‘The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(2/3): 525–542.10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, C. and Pozuelo, J.R. (2017), ‘Happiness, stress, and age: How the U curve varies across people and places’, Journal of Population Economics, 30(1): 225–264.10.1007/s00148-016-0611-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, fast and slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kniesner, T.J., Viscusi, W.K. and Ziliak, J.P. (2006), ‘Life-cycle consumption and the age-adjusted value of life’, Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), article 4.Google Scholar
Sloan, F.A., Viscusi, W.K., Chesson, H.W., Conover, C.J. and Whetten-Goldstein, K. (1998), ‘Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: The evidence for multiple sclerosis’, Journal of Health Economics, 17(4): 475–497.10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00025-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A. and Stone, A.A. (2015), ‘Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing’, The Lancet, 385(9968): 630–648.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C. (2014), Valuing life: Humanizing the regulatory state, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
US Office of Management and Budget (2015), 2015 report to Congress on the benefits and costs of federal regulations and agency compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W.K. (2019), ‘Utility functions for mild and severe health risks’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 58(2/3): 143–166.10.1007/s11166-019-09301-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W.K. (2018), Pricing lives: Guideposts for a safer society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W.K. and Aldy, J.E. (2007), ‘Labor market estimates of the senior discount for the value of statistical life’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3): 377–392.10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W.K. and Hersch, J. (2008), ‘The mortality cost to smokers’, Journal of Health Economics, 27(4): 943–958.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.01.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, A., King, J.E., Inoue-Murayama, M., Matsuzawa, T. and Oswald, A.J. (2012), ‘evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U shape in human well-being’, PNAS, 109(49): 19949–19952.10.1073/pnas.1212592109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed