Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T09:37:45.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A machine learning perspective on responsible gambling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

ARMAN HASSANNIAKALAGER Open the ORCID record for ARMAN HASSANNIAKALAGER [Opens in a new window]  and
PHILIP W.S. NEWALL Open the ORCID record for PHILIP W.S. NEWALL [Opens in a new window]
ARMAN HASSANNIAKALAGER
Affiliation:
University of Bath, Bath, UK
PHILIP W.S. NEWALL*
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Philip W.S. Newall, Applied Psychology, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gamblers are frequently reminded to ‘gamble responsibly’. But these qualitative reminders come with no quantitative information for gamblers to judge relative product risk in skill-based gambling forms. By comparison, consumers purchasing alcohol are informed of product strength by alcohol by volume percentage (ABV%) or similar labels. This paper uses mixed logistic regression machine learning to uncover the potential variation in soccer betting outcomes. This paper uses data from four bet types and eight seasons of English Premier League soccer, ending in 2018. Outcomes across each bet type were compared using three betting strategies: the most-skilled prediction, a random strategy and the least-skilled prediction. There was a large spread in betting outcomes, with, for example, the per-bet average loss varying by a factor of 54 (from 1.1% to 58.9%). Gamblers’ losses were positively correlated with the observable betting odds across all bets, indicating that betting odds are one salient feature that could be used to inform gamblers about product risk. Such large differences in product risk are relevant to the promotion of responsible gambling.

Type
Article
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 237 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, P., Edman, J. and Ekman, M. (2005), ‘Predicting the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts’, International Journal of Forecasting, 21(3): 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, P., Memmert, D. and Popowicz, E. (2009), ‘Forecasting outcomes of the World Cup 2006 in football: Performance and confidence of bettors and laypeople’, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1): 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelini, G. and De Angelis, L. (2017), ‘PARX model for football match predictions’, Journal of Forecasting, 36(7): 795–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayton, P. (1997), ‘How to Be Incoherent and Seductive: Bookmakers' Odds and Support Theory’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1): 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babad, E. (1987), ‘Wishful thinking and objectivity among sports fans’, Social Behaviour, 2(4): 231–240.Google Scholar
Baio, G. and Blangiardo, M. (2010), ‘Bayesian hierarchical model for the prediction of football results’, Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(2): 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajgrowicz, P. and Scaillet, O. (2012), ‘Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs’, Journal of Financial Economics, 106(3): 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. and Sandholm, T. (2017), ‘Superhuman AI for heads-up no-limit poker: Libratus beats top professionals’, Science, 359(6374): 418–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buhagiar, R., Cortis, D. and Newall, P. W. S. (2018), ‘Why do some soccer bettors lose more money than others?’, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 18(2018): 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, J. (2018), UK Government Confirms FOBT Change Now Set for April 2019. Available: https://www.gambling.com/news/uk-government-confirms-fobt-change-now-set-for-april-2019-1674400.Google Scholar
Cassidy, R., Loussouarn, C. and Pisac, A. (2013), Fair Game: Producing Gambling Research – The Goldsmiths Report. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
Chagas, B. T. and Gomes, J. F. (2017), ‘Internet Gambling: A Critical Review of Behavioural Tracking Research’, Journal of Gambling Issues, 36.Google Scholar
Chen, B. and Ankenman, J. (2006), The Mathematics of Poker, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: ConJelCo LLC.Google Scholar
Collins, D., Green, S., d'Ardenne, J., Wardle, H. and Williams, S. (2014), Understanding of Return to Player Messages: Findings from User Testing, London: NatCen Social Research.Google Scholar
Constantinou, A. C. and Fenton, N. E. (2013), ‘Profiting from arbitrage and odds biases of the European football gambling market’, The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 7(2): 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinou, A., & Fenton, C., N. (2017), ‘Towards Smart-Data: Improving predictive accuracy in long-term football team performance’, Knowledge-Based Systems, 124: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortis, D. (2015), ‘Expected values and variances in bookmaker payouts: A theoretical approach towards setting limits on odds’, The Journal of Prediction Markets, 9(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M. J. and Pope, P. F. (2004), ‘The value of statistical forecasts in the UK association football betting market’, International Journal of Forecasting, 20(4): 697–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M. and Robinson, M. (1998), ‘A birth process model for association football matches’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47(3): 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feess, E., Müller, H. and Schumacher, C. (2014), ‘The favorite-longshot bias and the impact of experience’, Business Research, 7(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, D. (2008), “Soccer betting in Britain’, in Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets, eds. Hausch, D. B. and Ziemba, W. T., Elsevier, 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambleaware (2017), Remote Gambling Research: Interim report on Phase II. Available: https://about.gambleaware.org/media/1549/gamble-aware_remote-gambling-research_phase-2_pwc-report_august-2017-final.pdf.Google Scholar
Garcia-Retamero, R. and Cokely, E. T. (2017), ‘Designing visual aids that promote risk literacy: a systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics’, Human Factors, 59(4): 582–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, J. (2005), ‘Regression models for forecasting goals and match results in association football’, International Journal of Forecasting, 21(2): 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, J. and Asimakopoulos, I. (2004), ‘Forecasting football results and the efficiency of fixed-odds betting’, Journal of Forecasting, 23(1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, D. (2011), ‘Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review’, Tobacco Control, 20(5): 327–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harik, G., Cantú-Paz, E., Goldberg, D. E. and Miller, B. L. (1999), ‘The gambler's ruin problem, genetic algorithms, and the sizing of populations’, Evolutionary computation, 7(3): 231–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrigan, K., Brown, D. and Barton, K., , R. (2017), Classification of slot machines in Ontario: Providing relevant information to players. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Gambling Research Exchange Ontario.Google Scholar
Harvey, C. R. and Liu, Y. (2015), ‘Backtesting’, Journal of Portfolio Management, 42(1): 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertwig, R. (2017), ‘When to consider boosting: some rules for policy-makers’, Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2): 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, I. (1974), ‘Association football and statistical inference’, Applied Statistics, 23(2): 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hing, N., Russell, A. M., Li, E. and Vitartas, P. (2018), ‘Does the uptake of wagering inducements predict impulse betting on sport?’, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1): 146–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hing, N., Russell, A. M., Thomas, A. and Jenkinson, R. (2019), ‘Wagering Advertisements and Inducements: Exposure and Perceived Influence on Betting Behaviour’, Journal of Gambling Studies.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, F. Y., Bloch, D. A. and Larsen, M. D. (1998), ‘A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression’, Statistics in Medicine, 17(14): 1623–1634.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hvattum, L. M. and Arntzen, H. (2010), ‘Using ELO ratings for match result prediction in association football’, International Journal of Forecasting, 26(3): 460–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. C. and Gregory, P. (2009), ‘The impact of more visible standard drink labelling on youth alcohol consumption: Helping young people drink (ir) responsibly?’, Drug and Alcohol Review, 28(3): 230–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica, 47(2): 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G. (2017), Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins, London, UK: John Murray.Google Scholar
Kaunitz, L., Zhong, S. and Kreiner, J. (2017), ‘Beating the bookies with their own numbers-and how the online sports betting market is rigged’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02824.Google Scholar
Kersbergen, I. and Field, M. (2017), ‘Alcohol consumers’ attention to warning labels and brand information on alcohol packaging: Findings from cross-sectional and experimental studies’, BMC Public Health, 17(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Billieux, J., Bizzini, L., Monney, G., Fresard, E., Thorens, G., Bondolfi, G., El-Guebaly, N. and Zullino, D. (2012), ‘Effects of expertise on football betting’, Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 7: 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koning, R. H. (2000), ‘Balance in competition in Dutch soccer’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 49(3): 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, D. A. and Shaffer, H. J. (1999), ‘Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective’, Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(4): 289–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuypers, T. (2000), ‘Information and efficiency: an empirical study of a fixed odds betting market’, Applied Economics, 32(11): 1353–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, C., Zeileis, A. and Hornik, K. (2010), ‘Forecasting sports tournaments by ratings of (prob) abilities: A comparison for the EURO 2008’, International Journal of Forecasting, 26(3): 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessmann, S., Sung, M., Johnson, J. E. and Ma, T. (2012), ‘A new methodology for generating and combining statistical forecasting models to enhance competitive event prediction’, European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1): 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, C. and Woolley, R. (2007), ‘Risky business: A few provocations on the regulation of electronic gaming machines’, International Gambling Studies, 7(3): 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Estévez, A. and Griffiths, M. (2017), ‘Marketing and advertising online sports betting: a problem gambling perspective’, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 41(3): 256–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, F. and Young, M. (2015), ‘“Big gambling”: the rise of the global industry-state gambling complex’, Addiction Research & Theory, 23(1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, F., Young, M. and Doran, B. (2016), ‘The relationship between player losses and gambling-related harm: evidence from nationally representative cross-sectional surveys in four countries’, Addiction, 111(2): 320–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markham, F., Young, M. and Doran, B. (2014), ‘Gambling expenditure predicts harm: evidence from a venue-level study’, Addiction, 109(9): 1509–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, O. M., Langfield, T., Attwood, A. S., Allen, E., Drew, I., Votier, A. and Munafò, M. R. (2017), ‘No impact of calorie or unit information on ad libitum alcohol consumption’, Alcohol and Alcoholism, 53(1): 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D. (1974), ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior’, in Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka, P., New York: Academic Press, 105–142.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000), ‘Mixed MNL models for discrete response’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5): 447–470.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, C. (2016), The sadness and beauty of watching google's ai play go. Available: https://www.wired.com/2016/03/sadness-beauty-watching-googles-ai-play-go/.Google Scholar
Mohan, C. (1955), ‘The gambler's ruin problem with correlation’, Biometrika, 42(3/4): 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravčík, M., Schmid, M., Burch, N., Lisý, V., Morrill, D., Bard, N., Davis, T., Waugh, K., Johanson, M. and Bowling, M. (2017), ‘DeepStack: Expert-level artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker’, Science, 356(6337): 508–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newall, P. (2013), Further Limit Hold ‘Em: Exploring the Model Poker Game, Las Vegas, NV: Two Plus Two Publishing.Google Scholar
Newall, P. W. S., Thobhani, A., Walasek, L. and Meyer, C. (2018), “Impulsiveness and urgency:” Gambling advertising and the 2018 soccer World Cup. Available: https://psyarxiv.com/3uc9s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newall, P. W. S. (2015), ‘How bookies make your money’, Judgment and Decision Making, 10(3): 225–231.Google Scholar
Newall, P. W. S. (2018), ‘Dark nudges in gambling’, Addiction Research & Theory, 27(2): 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newall, P. W. S. (2017), ‘Behavioral complexity of British gambling advertising’, Addiction Research & Theory, 25(6): 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007), Public Health: Ethical Issues, UK: Cambridge Publishers.Google Scholar
Oberstone, J. (2009), ‘Differentiating the top English premier league football clubs from the rest of the pack: Identifying the keys to success’, Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 5(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orford, J. (2010), An Unsafe Bet? The Dangerous Rise of Gambling and the Debate We Should Be Having, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, A., Harris, A., Parke, J., Rigbye, J. and Blaszczynski, A. (2015), ‘Responsible marketing and advertising in gambling: a critical review’, The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 8(3): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, J., Parke, A. and Blaszczynski, A. (2016), Key Issues in Product-Based Harm Minimisation: Examining Theory, Evidence and Policy Issues Relevant in Great Britain, London: Responsible Gambling Trust.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2017), ‘Educating good decisions’, Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2): 162–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pleskac, T. J. and Hertwig, R. (2014), ‘Ecologically rational choice and the structure of the environment’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5): 2000–2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portman Group (2017), A Review of Research into the impacts of Alcohol Warning Labels on attitudes and behaviour. Available: http://www.portmangroup.org.uk/docs/default-source/alcohol-health-toolkit/final-for-publication-08-sept-17.pdf?sfvrsn=2.Google Scholar
van Loon Potter, R. J., van den Assem, M. J. and van Dolder, D. (2015), ‘Beyond chance? The persistence of performance in online poker’, PloS One, 10(3): e0115479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdum, D. (2018), Inside how sports betting went mainstream. Available: http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/id/24310393/gambling-how-media-daily-fantasy-new-thinking-us-pro-sports-commissioners-helped-sports-betting-become-accepted.Google Scholar
Rowe, B., De Ionno, D., Holland, J., Flude, C., Brodrick, L., Vinay, A. and Moutos, M. (2017), Responsible Gambling: Collaborative Innovation Identifying Good Practice and Inspiring Change, Revealing Reality.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P. and Massey, C. (2012), ‘Is optimism real?’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4): 630–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. A., Paton, D. and Vaughan Williams, L. (2009), ‘Do bookmakers possess superior skills to bettors in predicting outcomes?’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2): 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, D. and Cortis, D. (2017), ‘Balancing the book: Is it necessary and sufficient?’, The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 11(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stibe, A. and Cugelman, B. (2016), ‘Persuasive backfiring: when behavior change interventions trigger unintended negative outcomes’, in Persuasive Technology, eds. Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M. and Tscheligi, M., Springer, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Štrumbelj, E. (2014), ‘On determining probability forecasts from betting odds’, International Journal of Forecasting, 30(4): 934–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Štrumbelj, E. and Šikonja, M. R. (2010), ‘Online bookmakers’ odds as forecasts: The case of European soccer leagues’, International Journal of Forecasting, 26(3): 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thorp, E. O. (1998), ‘The invention of the first wearable computer’, Wearable Computers, 1998. Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, 4.Google Scholar
Titman, A., Costain, D., Ridall, P. and Gregory, K. (2015), ‘Joint modelling of goals and bookings in association football’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 178(3): 659–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan Williams, L. (1999), ‘Information efficiency in betting markets: A survey’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 51(1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss-Cohen, L., Konstantinidis, E., Speekenbrink, M. and Harvey, N. (2018), ‘Task complexity moderates the influence of descriptions in decisions from experience’, Cognition, 170: 209–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willoughby, K. A. (2002), ‘Winning games in Canadian football: A logistic regression analysis’, The College Mathematics Journal, 33(3): 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, R., Livingstone, C., Harrigan, K. and Rintoul, A. (2013), ‘House edge: hold percentage and the cost of EGM gambling’, International Gambling Studies, 13(3): 388–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarkoni, T. and Westfall, J. (2017), ‘Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6): 1100–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed