Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:28:10.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why do People Overthink? A Longitudinal Investigation of a Meta-Cognitive Model and Uncontrollability of Rumination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2018

Noboru Matsumoto Open the ORCID record for Noboru Matsumoto [Opens in a new window]  and
Satoshi Mochizuki
Noboru Matsumoto*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Japan
Satoshi Mochizuki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
*
Correspondence to Noboru Matsumoto, Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto City, Yoshida Nihonmatsucho, 606–8501Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The meta-cognitive model of rumination is a theoretical model regarding the relationship between rumination and depression. Although meta-cognitive therapy for rumination was established based on this model, insufficient longitudinal studies addressing this model have been conducted. Moreover, the uncontrollability of rumination, suggested to be driven by negative meta-beliefs about rumination, has not been examined using this meta-cognitive model. Aims: We longitudinally examined the meta-cognitive model and its relationship with uncontrollability of rumination and depressive symptoms. Method: Undergraduate students (n = 117) were asked to complete two measurements (with a 6-month gap between them) of positive and negative meta-beliefs about rumination, causal analysis, understanding, uncontrollability of rumination and depression. Results: Cross-lagged effect modelling revealed that positive meta-beliefs predicted high causal analytic rumination. However, the results did not support the causal analytic and understanding aspects of how rumination predicted negative meta-beliefs. Negative meta-beliefs predicted high depressive symptoms, and depressive symptoms predicted high negative meta-beliefs. Negative meta-beliefs predicted high uncontrollability of rumination, whereas uncontrollability of rumination did not predict depressive symptoms. Conclusions: The results partially supported the meta-cognitive model. The prediction of depressive symptoms on negative meta-beliefs suggests that depression-related cognition might be involved in increasing negative meta-beliefs, rather than the repetitive causal analytic and understanding aspects of rumination. In line with meta-cognitive therapy, negative meta-beliefs could be a target for treating depression.

Keywords

ruminationmeta-cognitiondepressioncross-lagged effect modellinguncontrollability
Type
Brief Clinical Report
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 504 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Author's present address: Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.

References

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. and Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory – second edition. Harcourt Assessment, Inc.Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, C. and Wells, A. (2003). An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 261–273. doi: 10.1023/a:1023962332399Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, C. and Wells, A. (2009). A prospective test of the clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 2, 123–131. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2009.2.2.123Google Scholar
Raes, F., Hermans, D., Williams, J. M. G., Bijttebier, P. and Eelen, P. (2008). A ‘triple W’-model of rumination on sadness: Why am I feeling sad, what's the meaning of my sadness, and wish I could stop thinking about my sadness (but I can't!). Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 526–541. doi: 10.1007/s10608-007-9137-yGoogle Scholar
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R. and Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259. doi: 10.1023/a:1023910315561Google Scholar
Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Matsumoto and Mochizuki supplementary material

Matsumoto and Mochizuki supplementary material 1

Download Matsumoto and Mochizuki supplementary material(File)
File 89.4 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.