Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:11:59.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Treatment of Chronic Blushing by Paradoxical Intention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Michael W. H. Timms
Affiliation:
Newcastle Hospital, Greystones, Co. Wicklow, Ireland

Extract

Two previous articles report the successful treatment of chronic blushing (Salter, 1952, Case 10; Gibbs, 1965). Both cases employed techniques which were designed to increase the patient's self-assertiveness. As an adjunct to his therapy, Salter instructed his patient in the use of paradoxical intention to diminish blushing behaviour. This technique derives from Dunlap's (1932) beta hypothesis on learning which states that “the occurence of a response lessens the probability that on the recurrence of the same stimulus pattern, the same response will recur” (page 78). The present case describes the treatment of blushing with paradoxical intention alone.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunlap, K. (1932). “Habits: Their Making and Unmaking”. Liveright, New York.Google Scholar
Gibbs, D. N. (1965). “Reciprocal Inhibition Therapy of a Case of Symptomatic ErythemaBehav. Res. Ther. 2, 261266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, A. (1952). “Conditioned Reflex Therapy”. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Willoughby, A. A. (1932). “Some properties of the Thurstone Personality Schedule and a suggested revision.” J. soc. Psychol., 3, 401409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, A. A. (1934). “Norms for the Clarke — Thurstone Inventory”. J. soc. Psychol., 5, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1958). “Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition.” Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.