Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:57:55.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transdiagnostic CBT Treatment of Co-morbid Anxiety and Depression in an Older Adult: Single Case Experimental Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

Ben Hague ,
Shonagh Scott  and
Stephen Kellett
Ben Hague*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield, UK
Shonagh Scott
Affiliation:
Sheffield Social and Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Stephen Kellett
Affiliation:
Sheffield Social and Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, and University of Sheffield, UK
*
Reprint requests to Ben Hague, Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Despite the prevalence of co-morbid anxiety and depression in older adults, evaluation of suitable clinical models is rare. Aims: This study tested the acceptability and effectiveness of a transdiagnostic approach to treating co-morbid anxiety and depression in an older adults in a routine clinical setting. Method: In an A/B single case experimental design, a patient completed five daily ideographic measures of anxiety and depression across baseline and treatment and the HADS at five time points over time, including 3-month follow-up. The 8-session treatment was transdiagnostic CBT informed by the Unified Protocol. Results: All sessions were attended. Significant baseline-treatment improvements were found for daily structure, mood, confidence and worry, with large associated effect sizes. The HADS showed that the patient met recovery criteria by the end of treatment, with some evidence of anxious relapse at follow-up. Conclusion: Transdiagnostic CBT offers promise as a treatment approach to mixed anxiety and depression in older adults. The model needs to be further tested using more rigorous and suitably powered methodologies.

Keywords

Unified protocolsingle case experimental designolder adults
Type
Brief Clinical Report
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Barlow, D., Farchione, T., Fairholme, C., Ellard, K., Boisseau, C.L., Allen, L.B., et al. (2011). The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: therapist guide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King-Kallimanis, B., Gum, A. and Kohn, R. (2009). Co morbidity of depressive and anxiety disorders for older Americans in the national co morbidity survey-replication. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 782–792. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181ad4d17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenze, E. (2003). Comorbidity of depression and anxiety in the elderly. Current Psychiatry Reports, 5, 62–67. doi:10.1007/s11920-003-0011-7 Google Scholar
McMillan, D. and Morley, S. (2010). The quantitative single-case design as a research strategy for practice-based evidence. In Barkham, M., Hardy, G.E. and Mellor-Clark, J. (Eds.), Developing and Delivering Practice-Based Evidence: a guide for the psychological therapies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). CG90: Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults (partial update of NICE clinical guideline 23). Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG90NICEguideline.pdf Google Scholar
Zigmond, A. and Snaith, R. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandanavica, 67, 361–70. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Hague Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Hague Supplementary Material(File)
File 122.6 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.