Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:18:13.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Specialist Unit for Difficult to Manage Patients: Preliminary Findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Myra Cooper
Affiliation:
Aylesbury Vale Health Care
Patsy Holly
Affiliation:
Aylesbury Vale Health Care
Simon Hampson
Affiliation:
Aylesbury Vale Health Care

Extract

Preliminary findings are reported from a specialist unit for difficult to manage patients (those patients who have severe behavioural problems in addition to a mental illness). Staff attitudes and residents' psychiatric and social needs were assessed after the unit had been open for just over a year. The effect on residents' behaviour and symptoms over the course of that year was also evaluated. Findings showed that staff attitudes were resident orientated and that interactions between staff and residents and of staff with each other were almost always positive. These findings compared favourably with data collected on three other continuing care units in the same Trust and with data from previously published studies. The Cardinal Needs Schedule, a recent adaptation of the MRC Needs for Care Assessment Schedule, appeared to be a useful way of identifying unmet needs of the residents and gaps in service provision. Over the course of the year, behaviour in one third of the residents improved sufficiently for them to be considered suitable for potential discharge into community based accommodation. Implications of the findings for specialist units for difficult to manage patients are discussed, together with suggestions for further research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C. I, Gillespie, C. R., & Hall, J. N. (1989). A comparison of practices, attitudes and interactions in two established units for people with a psychiatric disability. Psychological Medicine, 19, 459467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. & Hall, J. N. (1983). REHAB: Rehabilitation Evaluation Hall and Baker. Aberdeen, Scotland: Vine Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Brewin, C. R., Wing, J. K., Mangen, S. P., Brugha, T. S., & MacCarthy, B. (1987). Principles and practice of measuring needs in the long term mentally ill: The MRC Needs for Care Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 17, 971981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garety, P. A. & Morris, I. (1984). A new unit for long stay psychiatric patients: Organisation, attitudes and quality of care. Psychological Medicine, 14, 183192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, L. I. & Marshall, M. (1992). Can we measure need in the homeless mentally ill? Using the MRC Needs for Care Assessment in hostels for the homeless. Psychological Medicine, 22, 10271034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, R. D., Raynes, N. V., & Tizard, J. (1971). Patterns of residental care. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Krawiecka, M., Goldberg, D., & Vaughan, M. (1977). A standardised psychiatric assessment for rating chronic psychotic patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 55, 299308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipinski, D. & Nelson, R. (1974). Problems of the use of naturalistic observation as a means of behaviour assessment. Behaviour Therapy, 5, 341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, H. A. & Kerr, T. A. (1991). Long-term difficult to manage patients – their need for continuity of care: Discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 613614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, I. M., Connolly, J., Muijen, M., Audini, B., McNamee, G., & Lawrence, R. E. (1994). Home-based versus hospital-based care for people with serious mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 179194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, M. (1994). How should we measure need? Concept and practice in the development of standardised assessments of need. Philosophy, Psychology, Psychiatry, 1, 2740.Google Scholar
Marshall, M., Hogg, L, Lockwood, A., & Gath, D. (1995). The Cardinal Needs Schedule: a modified version of the MRC Needs for Care Schedule. Psychological Medicine, 25, 605617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1990). The functions of asylums. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 822827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.