Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:51:39.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PSYCHOLOGIST, PATIENT, AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATINGS OF OUTCOME OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENTS FOR PANIC DISORDER AND AGORAPHOBIA IN PRIMARY CARE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1998

Donald M. Sharp
Affiliation:
University of Stirling and Tayside Area Clinical Psychology Department, U.K.
Kevin G. Power
Affiliation:
University of Stirling and Tayside Area Clinical Psychology Department, U.K.

Abstract

Recent discussion has emphasized the importance of assessments of clinical significance of outcome in treatment outcome studies. Several methods exist to assess clinical significance, one of which is the use of global ratings of outcome. This study reports the use of such measures in a treatment outcome study investigating pharmacological and psychological treatments for panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care. Outcome is reported in terms of global ratings of symptom severity and of change in symptoms following treatment, completed by the psychologist, referring General Practitioners (GPs) and patients. Treatments involving cognitive behaviour therapy showed greater efficacy than those employing pharmacological treatments alone. Considerable agreement was demonstrated between psychologist and patient ratings. Such agreement was much less obvious for ratings completed by referring GPs. Possible reasons for this are advanced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.