Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T09:17:03.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of transdiagnostic seminars to support patients with common mental disorders: a multi-service practice research network study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Chris Gaskell Open the ORCID record for Chris Gaskell [Opens in a new window] ,
Ryan Askey-Jones Open the ORCID record for Ryan Askey-Jones [Opens in a new window] ,
Martin Groom Open the ORCID record for Martin Groom [Opens in a new window]  and
Jaime Delgadillo Open the ORCID record for Jaime Delgadillo [Opens in a new window]
Chris Gaskell*
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Ryan Askey-Jones
Affiliation:
First Step Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Trust, Cumbria, UK
Martin Groom
Affiliation:
Leeds Mental Well-Being Service, Leeds Community Healthcare Trust, Leeds, UK
Jaime Delgadillo
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

This was a multi-site evaluation of psycho-educational transdiagnostic seminars (TDS) as a pre-treatment intervention to enhance the effectiveness and utilisation of high-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT).

Aims:

To evaluate the effectiveness of TDS combined with high-intensity CBT (TDS+CBT) versus a matched sample receiving CBT only. Second, to determine the consistency of results across participating services which employed CBT+TDS. Finally, to determine the acceptability of TDS across patients with different psychological disorders.

Method:

106 patients across three services voluntarily attended TDS while on a waiting list for CBT (TDS+CBT). Individual and pooled service pre–post treatment effect sizes were calculated using measures of depression, anxiety and functional impairment. Effectiveness and completion rates for TDS+CBT were compared with a propensity score matched sample from an archival dataset of cases who received high-intensity CBT only.

Results:

Pre–post treatment effect sizes for TDS+CBT were comparable to the matched sample. Recovery rates were greater for the group receiving TDS; however, this was not statistically significant. Greater improvements were observed during the waiting-list period for patients who had received TDS for depression (d = 0.49 compared with d = 0.07) and anxiety (d = 0.36 compared with d = 0.04).

Conclusions:

Overall, this new evidence found a trend for TDS improving symptoms while awaiting CBT across three separate IAPT services. The effectiveness of TDS now warrants further exploration through an appropriately sized randomised control trial.

Keywords

attritionCBTIAPTinterventionpre-treatmentwaiting list
Type
Main
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , July 2021 , pp. 495 - 507
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, M. E. (2002). Methods for disseminating research products and increasing evidence-based practice: promises, obstacles, and future directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.4.367 Google Scholar
Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choates, M. L. (2004). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders: history of development. Behavior Therapy, 35, 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80036-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Latin, L.M., Ellard, K. K., Billis, J. R., Bentley, K. H., Boettcher, H. T., & Caseillo-Robbins, C. (2017). Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorder (2nd edn). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berle, N., & Sakiris, D. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the unified protocol as a transdiagnostic emotion regulation based intervention. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, 101751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101751 Google Scholar
Burns, P., Kellett, S., & Donohoe, G. (2016). ‘Stress Control’ as a large group psychoeducational intervention at Step 2 of IAPT services: acceptability of the approach and moderators of effectiveness. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 44, 431–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465815000491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, J., Barkham, M., Hardy, G., Rees, A., Shapiro, D. A., Stiles, W. B., & Macaskill, N. (2003). Outcomes of patients completing and not completing cognitive therapy for depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466503321903553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. (2018). Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14, 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084833 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuijpers, P., Weitz, E., Cristea, I. A., & Twisk, J. (2017). Pre-post effect sizes should be avoided in meta-analyses. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 26, 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016000809 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgadillo, J., & Groom, M. (2017). Using psychoeducation and role induction to improve completion rates in cognitive behavioural therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45, 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465816000643 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgadillo, J., Kellett, S., Ali, S., McMillan, D., Barkham, M., Saxon, D., Donohoe, G., Stonebank, H., Mullaney, S., Eschoe, P., Thwaites, R., & Lucock, M. (2016). A multi-service practice research network study of large group psychoeducational cognitive behavioural therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 87, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (2011). National Curriculum for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Courses (2nd edition, updated and revised).Google Scholar
Finegan, M., Firth, N., & Delgadillo, J. (2020). Adverse impact of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation on psychological treatment outcomes: the role of area-level income and crime. Psychotherapy Research, 30, 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1649500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive Behavioural Processes Across Psychological Disorders: A Transdiagnostic Approach to Research and Treatment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAPT (2019). Black Asian and Minority Ethnic Service User Positive Practice Guide. Available at: https://babcp.com/Therapists/BAME-Positive-Practice-Guide-PDF (accessed 16 January 2021).Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellett, S., Clarke, S., & Matthews, L. (2007). Delivering group psychoeducational CBT in primary care: comparing outcomes with individual CBT and individual psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466506X146188 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minami, T., Serlin, R. C., Wampold, B. E., Kircher, J., & Brown, G. J. (2008). Using clinical trials to benchmark effects produced in clinical practice. Quality and Quantity, 42, 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9057-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundt, J. C., Marks, I. M., Shear, M. K., & Greist, J. H. (2002). The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2011). Common Mental Health Problems: Identification and Pathways to Care. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
Newby, J. M., McKinnon, A., Kuyken, W., Gilbody, , & Dalgleish, T. (2015). Systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic psychological treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in adulthood. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, P. J. (2012). Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy of Anxiety: A Transdiagnostic Treatment Manual. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Oldham, M., Kellett, S., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Interventions to increase attendance at psychotherapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled Trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029630 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, D. A., & Borglin, G. (2011). Implementation of psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in routine practice: two year prospective cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.024 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2008). Using an evidence-based methodology to identify the competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465808004141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., Williams, J., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gaskell et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Gaskell et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gaskell et al. supplementary material

Table S3

Download Gaskell et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gaskell et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Gaskell et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.1 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.