Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:12:03.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Three Different Approaches Used in Large-Scale Stress Workshops for the General Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2005

Nicole A. Main
Affiliation:
Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, London, UK
Sandra A. Elliot
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
June S. L. Brown
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

Abstract

Given the large unmet need for services for anxiety, there is a need to develop larger-scale psychological interventions. Group interventions could help meet the need but the kind of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) approach used merits investigation. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness and attendance of participants self-referring to three different CBT workshops: CBT, Cognitive Therapy (CT) only, and Behavioural (BT) only. Between 1998 and 2001 a series of day-long self-referral stress workshops were offered to members of the general public in South East London. A comparison was made of those attending the workshops immediately and those attending the workshops after a 3-month delay. Participants attending all three types of workshop reported reduced stress and anxiety compared with those in the wait-list control conditions. All three workshops were equally well attended. Results support previous findings showing the clinical effectiveness of large-scale stress workshops for the general public who suffer from high levels of anxiety. The specific kind of CBT approach did not make a marked difference either to attendance or outcome, although the CT groups invoked a greater degree of change on standardized measures than the BT or CBT groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Additional material is available online in the table of contents for this issue: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_BCP.
Supplementary material: File

Main supplementary material

supplementary material document

Download Main supplementary material(File)
File 22 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.