Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:29:56.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Effectiveness of Three Therapeutic Modalities in the Psychological Treatment of Pathological Gambling: Long-Term Outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Enrique Echeburúa ,
Concepción Báez  and
Javier Fernández-Montalvo
Enrique Echeburúa
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco, España
Concepción Báez
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco, España
Javier Fernández-Montalvo
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco, España
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to test the comparative effectiveness of three therapeutic modalities: a) individual stimulus control and exposure with response prevention; b) group cognitive restructuring; and c) a+b in the treatment of pathological gambling with slot machines. An additional waiting-list group was used to evaluate the spontaneous evolution of the non-treated gamblers. The sample consisted of 64 patients selected according to DSM-III-R criteria. A multigroup experimental design with repeated measures (pretreatment, posttreatment and 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up) was used. Most treated patients gave up gambling as well as improved, albeit more slowly, in family/social and psychological functioning. The success rate was higher in the individual treatment compared both to group and combined treatment. There was also an improvement in gambling in the control group between the pretreatment and the 6–month follow-up and there was no difference between the combined treatment and control group. Individual stimulus control and exposure with response prevention appears to be a cost-effective therapy for pathological gambling. Implications of this study for clinical practice and future research in this field are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 51 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allcock, C.C. (1986). Pathological gambling. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 20, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd Ed. Revised). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Arribas, M.P. and Martínez, J.J. (1991). Tratamiento individual de jugadores patológicos: descripción de casos. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta 17, 255–269.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelsohn, M., Mock, J. and Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 4, 561–671.Google Scholar
Becoña, E. (1992). The prevalence of pathological gambling in Galicia (Spain). The Society for the Study of Gambling Newsletter 20, 10–18.Google Scholar
Becoña, E. (1993). El juego compulsivo en la comunidad autónoma gallega. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia.Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A. (1993). Juego patológico: una revisión de los tratamientos. Psicología Conductual 1, 409–440.Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., McConaghy, N. and Frankova, A. (1991). Control versus abstinence in the treatment of pathological gambling: a two to nine year follow-up. British Journal of Addiction 86, 299–306.Google Scholar
Brown, R.I. (1987). Dropouts and continuers in Gamblers Anonymous: 4. Evaluation and summary. Journal of Gambling Behavior 3, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, D.C. and Glautier, S. (1994). A controlled trial of cue exposure treatment in alcohol dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, 809–817.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. (1992). Psicopatología, variables de personalidad y vulnerabilidad psicológica al juego patológico. Psicothema 4, 7–20.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. (1993). Las conductas adictivas: ¿una ruta común desde el “crack” al juego patológico? Psicología Conductual 1, 321–337.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. and Báez, C. (1990). Enfoques terapéuticos en el tratamiento psicológico del juego patológico. Revista Española de Terapia del Comportamiento 8, 127–146.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. & Báez, C. (1994a). Concepto y evaluación del juego patológico. En Graña, J.L. (ed.). Conductas adictivas: teoría, evaluación y tratamiento. Madrid: Debate.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. and Báez, C. (1994b). Tratamiento psicológico del juego patológico. In Graña, J.L. (Ed). Conductas adictivas: teoría, evaluación y tratamiento. Madrid: Debate.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. and Corral, P. (1987). Escala de Adaptación. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
González, A. (1989). Juego patológico. Una nueva adicción. Madrid: Tibidabo.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. and Rankin, H. (1982). Compulsive gamblers in treatment. British Journal of Psychiatry 140, 364–366.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M.D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology 85, 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legarda, J.J., Babio, R. and Abreu, J.M. (1992). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in Seville (Spain). British Journal of Addictions 87, 767–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesieur, H.R. and Blume, S.B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry 144, 1184–1189.Google Scholar
Lesieur, H.R. and Blume, S.B. (1991). Evaluation of patients treated for pathological gambling in a combined alcohol, substance abuse and pathological gambling treatment unit using the Addiction Severity Index. British Journal of Addiction 86, 1017–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConaghy, N., Armstrong, M., Blaszczynski, A. and Allcock, C. (1983). Controlled comparison of aversion therapy and imaginal desensitization in compulsive gambling. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 366–372.Google Scholar
McConaghy, N., Armstrong, M., Blaszczynski, A. and Allcock, C. (1988). Behavior completion versus stimulus control in compulsive gambling. Behavior Modification 12, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConaghy, N., Blaszczynski, A. and Frankova, A. (1991). Comparison of imaginal desensitisation with other behavioural treatment of pathological gambling. A two to nine year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry 159, 390–393.Google Scholar
McCormick, R. and Ramírez, L. (1988). Pathological gambling. In Howells, J.G. (Ed). Modern perspectives in psychosocial pathology. New York: Brunner/Mazel Inc.Google Scholar
Saiz-Ruiz, J., Moreno, I. and López-Ibor, J.J. (1992). Ludopatía: estudio clínico y terapéutico-evolutivo de jugadores patológicos. Actas Luso–Españolas de Neurología y Psiquiatría 20, 189–197.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. and Lindner, A. (1992). Inpatient treatment of male pathological gamblers in Germany. Journal of Gambling Studies 8, 93–109.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L. and Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Taber, J.I., McCormick, R.A., Russo, A.M., Adkins, B.J. and Ramírez, L.F. (1987). Follow-up of pathological gamblers after treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry 14, 757–761.Google Scholar
Volberg, R.A. and Steadman, H.J. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry 146, 1618–1619.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.