Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:39:13.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of Companion Pets with Elderly Psychiatric Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Elaine Haughie ,
Derek Milne  and
Valerie Elliott
Elaine Haughie
Affiliation:
St Augustine's Hospital, Canterbury
Derek Milne
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, Morpeth, Northumberland
Valerie Elliott
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, Morpeth, Northumberland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The main aim of this study was to evaluate pet therapy in terms of increased interaction with two groups of elderly psychiatric patients. These patients were different in respect of their diagnosis, but their environments were similar in layout, decor and facilities. Each group of patients was observed by an independent observer, and further rated by the ward nurses on a scale which recorded change in their behaviour over the three conditions: baseline, dog intervention and photographic intervention. The total time of observing was four weeks where the baseline (i.e. “normal” amount of interaction) and the two intervening stimuli were introduced, and compared with one another. Time sampling was used throughout the study. The results indicate that the dog intervention was the most effective in increasing interaction when comparisons were made with other conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1992 , pp. 367 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brickel, C. M. (1979). The therapeutic roles of cat mascots with hospital based geriatric population: a staff survey. Gerontologist 17, 368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickel, C. M. (1982). Pet facilitated psychotherapy: theoretical explanation via attention shift. Psychological Reports 50, 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corson, S., Corson, E. O., Gywnne, P. H. and Arnold, L. E. (1975). Pet facilitated psychotherapy in a hospital setting. In Masserman, J. (Ed). Current Psychiatric Therapies 15. New York: Grune and Stratton, pp. 277–286.Google Scholar
Corson, S. A., Corson, E. O., Gywnne, P. H. and Arnold, L. E. (1977). Pet dogs as nonverbal communication links in hospital psychiatry. Comprehensive Psychiatry 18, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drabman, R. S., Hammer, D. and Rosenbaum, M. A. (1979). Assessing generalisation with children: a generalisation map. Behavioural Assessment 6, 203–219.Google Scholar
Elliott, V. and Milne, D. (1991). Patients' best friend. Nursing Times 87, 6.Google ScholarPubMed
Hendy, H. M. (1984). Effects of pets on the sociability and health activities of nursing home residents. In Anderson, R. K. and Hart, B. L. (Eds). The Pet Connection. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Katcher, A. H. and Beck, A. M. (1983). New Perspective on Our Life with Companion Animals. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, M. J. (1980). Animal facilitated therapy: overview and future direction. In Katcher, A. H. and Beck, A. M. (Eds). New Perspective on Our Life with Companion Animals. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mugford, R. A. and M'Chomisky, (1975). Therapeutic value of caged birds with old people. In Anderson, R. S. (Ed). Pet Animals and Society. London: Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.