Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:36:37.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Staff Training to Run Activity Groups with People with Profound Learning Disabilities: Evaluation of Attitude, Knowledge and Skill Changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Valerie Binney
Valerie Binney
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A training course designed to prepare staff to run stimulation groups for people with profound learning disabilities is described and evaluated. Nursing staff attending the day workshop improved significantly more than a control group in their attitudes, knowledge and skills (a simulated performance test) in relation to appropriate stimulation for this group. A profile of pre-training attitude, knowledge and skill is provided for different staff groups and it is shown that, prior to the workshop, nursing assistants had significantly more negative attitudes to such activities than trained staff or those in training. While each staff group improved on attitude and knowledge tests, nursing assistants alone failed to show post-training skill improvements. The practical implications of the results are discussed and the usefulness of the three measures assessed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 267 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behaviour relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 85, 888–918.Google Scholar
Beail, N. (1985). The nature of interactions between nursing staff and profoundly multiply handicapped children. Child Care, Health and Development 11, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beail, N. (1988). A comparative observational study of the care provided in hospital with the care provided at home for profoundly multiply handicapped children. Behavioural Psychotherapy 16, 285–296.Google Scholar
Berger, M. (1979). Behavior modification in education and professional practice: the dangers of a mindless technology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 32, 418–419.Google Scholar
Bernstein, G. S. (1982). Training behaviour change agents: a conceptual review. Behaviour Therapy 13, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, E. and Blunden, R. (1979). The establishment and maintenance of a ward-based activity period within a mental handicap hospital. Research Report No. 48. Mental Handicap in Wales Applied Research Unit, University of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. and Sloper, P. (1978). Helping your Handicapped Baby. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Development Team for Mentally Handicapped People (1985). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Farrell, P. T. (1982). An evaluation of an EDY course in behaviour modification techniques for teachers and care staff in an ESN(S) school. Special Education. Forward Trends 9, Research Supplement.Google Scholar
Felce, D., DeKock, U. and Repp, A. C. (1986). An eco-behavioural analysis of small community based houses and a traditional large hospital for severely and profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Applied Research in Mental Retardation 7, 393–408.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. M. (1972). Teaching behavior modification to non-professionals. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 5, 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. M., Brust, D. J. and Watson, L. S. (1970). A scale to measure skill in applying behavior modification techniques to the mentally retarded. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 74, 633–636.Google Scholar
Heinrich, R. L. (1981). AABT's continuing education committee: 1977–1980. Behaviour Therapist 4, 11–13.Google Scholar
Hong, C. S., Cockerill, H. and Forrest, J. (1981). Helping staff to select play activities for the development of play skills in the mentally handicapped. Apex: Journal of the British Institute of Mental Handicap 9, 57–59.Google Scholar
Ivancic, M. T., Reid, D. H., Iwata, B. A., Faw, G. D. and Page, T. J. (1981). Evaluating a supervision program for developing and maintaining therapeutic staff-resident interactions during institutional care routines. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 14, 950–1107.Google Scholar
Jeffree, D., McConkey, R. and Hewson, S. (1977). Let Me Play. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Knowles, M. and Landesman-Dwyer, S. (1986). National survey of state sponsored training for residential direct care staff. Mental Retardation 24, 293–300.Google ScholarPubMed
Landesman-Dwyer, S. and Knowles, M. (1987). Ecological analysis of staff training in residential settings. In Hogg, J. and Mittler, P. (Eds). Issues in Staff Training in Mental Handicap. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Leyin, A. (1982). Go and play: a four-part approach to play with the mentally handicapped. Mental Handicap 10, 84–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConkey, R., McEnvoy, J. and Gallagher, F. (1982). Learning through play: the evalution of a video-course for parents of handicapped children. Child Care, Health and Development 8, 345–359.Google Scholar
Milne, D. (1981). A comparison of two methods of teaching behavior modification to mental handicap nurses. Behavioural Psychotherapy 9, 1–11.Google Scholar
Milne, D. (1985). An ecological validation of nurse training in behaviour therapy. Behavioural Psychotherapy 13, 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, D. (1986). Training Therapists: Methods, Evaluation and Implementation with Parents, Nurses and Teachers. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Mittler, P. (1974). The Educational Needs of Mentally Handicapped Adults. Manchester: Report of a Joint Conference, National Society for Mentally Handicapped Children.Google Scholar
Mittler, P. (1987). Introduction. In Hogg, J. and Mittler, P. (Eds). Issues in Staff Training in Mental Handicap. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Nand, R. S. (1980). Organization of activity periods for profoundly mentally handicapped young adults. Nursing Times, 9 October, 1807–1809.Google Scholar
National Development Group (1978). Helping Mentally Handicapped People in Hospital. A Report to the Secretary of State for Social Services by the Department of Health & Social Security. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Newson, E. and Hipgrave, T. (1982). Getting Through to Your Handicapped Child. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Dell, S. L., Tarler-Benlolo, L. and Flynn, J. M. (1979). An instrument to measure knowledge of behavioural principles as applied to children. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 10, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozols, D. V. A. (1982). The effectiveness of staff-resident interaction in establishing purposeful activity in a group of profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Unpublished dissertation, B.P.S. Diploma in Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
Perkins, E. A. and Taylor, P. D. (1980). Learning through play. Mental Handicap 8, 19–22.Google Scholar
Porterfield, J., Blunden, R. and Blewitt, E. (1980). Improving the environment for profoundly handicapped adults: establishing staff routines for high client engagement. Behaviour Modification 4, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R., Gardner, J., Flanagan, M. and Friel, K. (1982). Sheldon Home Play Project: Increasing activity levels of long-stay hospital residents. Mental Handicap 10, 24–26.Google Scholar
Sepler, H. L. and Myers, S. L. (1978). The effectiveness of verbal instruction on teaching behaviour modification skills to non-professionals. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 11, 198.Google Scholar
Toy Libraries Association (1980). Play, Toys and Toy Libraries in Mental Handicap Hospitals. Potters Bar: Toy Libraries Association.Google Scholar
Wright, J., Mathieu, M. and McDonough, C. (1981). An evaluation of three approaches to the teaching of behavioural therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 37, 326–335.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.