Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:33:39.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POWER THERAPIES: EVIDENCE VS MIRACULOUS CLAIMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

Gerald M. Rosen ,
Jeffey M. Lohr ,
Richard J. McNally  and
James D. Herbert
Gerald M. Rosen
Affiliation:
University of Washington, U.S.A.
Jeffey M. Lohr
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, U.S.A.
Richard J. McNally
Affiliation:
Harvard University, U.S.A.
James D. Herbert
Affiliation:
Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Poole, de Jongh and Spector ask for empirical research rather than emotive arguments when evaluating EMDR. When one applies this standard, Poole et al.’s remaining points are devoid of substance. EMDR, like other Power Therapies, is a “miracle” cure that has failed.

Keywords

EMDRPTSDplacebosham therapies
Type
Leading Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 9 - 12
Copyright
© 1999 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.