Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:35:49.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp): A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Lisa Wood ,
Eilish Burke  and
Anthony Morrison
Lisa Wood*
Affiliation:
Psychosis Research Unit, Prestwich Hospital, Manchester, UK
Eilish Burke
Affiliation:
Psychosis Research Unit, Prestwich Hospital, Manchester, UK
Anthony Morrison
Affiliation:
Psychosis Research Unit, Prestwich Hospital, Manchester, UK
*
Reprint requests to Lisa Wood, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester West NHS Foundation Trust, Psychology Services, Prestwich Hospital, Manchester M25 3BL, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Individual Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is the first line recommended psychological intervention for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia. However, little is yet known about service users’ subjective experiences of CBTp. Aims: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of qualitative literature to examine service user perspective of CBTp. Method: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies examining service users’ experiences of CBTp was conducted. A total of six studies were included in the analysis. Results: Three superordinate themes were identified: therapeutic alliance; facilitating change; and challenges of applying CBTp. Conclusion: Overall, CBTp is a helpful and acceptable therapeutic approach to service users. Developing a collaborative therapeutic relationship is essential. The applications of CBTp can be problematic and the therapist and client need to work together to overcome these difficulties.

Keywords

Thematic synthesispsychosiscognitive behaviour therapy
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 285 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors recognize that the terms and language used in this paper are not universally endorsed. Where differences of opinion arose, the team decided to use the term that was endorsed by the majority, whilst also respecting the views of others.

References

Aldersen, P. (1995). Listening to Children. London: Banardos.Google Scholar
Berry, C. and Hayward, M. (2011). What can qualitative research tell us about service user perspectives of CBT for psychosis? A synthesis of current evidence. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39, 487–494.Google Scholar
Byrne, R., Davies, L. and Morrison, A. (2010). Priorities and preferences for the outcomes of treatment in psychosis: a service user perspective. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches, 2, 210–217.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. and Morrison, A. (2013). Young people at risk of psychosis: their subjective experiences of monitoring and cognitive behaviour therapy in the Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation 2 trial. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practise. doi: 10.1111/papt.12013 Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J. (2006). Person-Based Cognitive Therapy for Distressing Psychosis. London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickersin, K., Scherer, R. and Lefebvre, C. (1994). Systematic reviews: identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 309, 1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, H., Morrison, A. and Bentall, R. (2002). Patients’ experience of homework tasks in cognitive behavioural therapy for voices. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 993–1003.Google Scholar
Gaston, L. and Marmar, C. R. (1991). Manual for the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales – CALPAS. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Holmes, S., Rossiter, R. and Jennison, J. (2011). Adapting CBT for Psychosis: creative ways with cognitive impairments. Paper presented at the BABCP conference, London.Google Scholar
Hutton, P., Wood, L. and Morrison, A. (in press). Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: rationale and protocol for a systematic review and prospective meta-analysis. Psychosis.Google Scholar
Jones, C., Hacker, D., Coarmac, I., Meaden, A. and Irving, C. B. (2012). Cognitive behaviour therapy versus other psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 4, CD008712.Google Scholar
Kilbride, M., Byrne, R., Price, J., Wood, L., Barratt, S. and Morrison, A. P. (2013). Exploring service user perceptions of cogntive behavioural therapy for psychosis: a user led study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 41, 89–102.Google Scholar
Lynch, D., Laws, K. R. and McKenna, P. J. (2009). Cognitive behavioural therapy for major psychiatric disorder: does it really work? A meta-analytical review of well-controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 40, 9–24.Google Scholar
McCabe, R. and Priebe, S. (2004). The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness: a review of methods and findings. Journal of Social Psychiatry, 50, 115–128.Google Scholar
McGowan, J., Lavender, T. and Garety, P. (2005). Factors in outcome of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: users’ and clinicians’ views. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 513–529.Google Scholar
Messari, S. and Hallam, R. (2003). CBT for psychosis: a qualitative analysis of clients’ experiences. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 171–188.Google Scholar
Morberg Pain, C., Chadwick, P. and Abba, N. (2008). Clients’ experiences of case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 127–138.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. and Barratt, S. (2010). What are the components of CBT for psychosis? A Delphi study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 136–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, A., Renton, J., Dunn, H., Williams, S. and Bentall, R. (2003). Cognitive Therapy for Psychosis: a formulation based approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
NICE (2009). Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. London: NICE.Google Scholar
Pitt, L., Kilbride, M., Nothard, S., Welford, M. and Morrison, A. P. (2007). Researching recovery from psychosis: a user-led project. Psychiatry Bulletin, 31, 55–60.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
Vindogradov, S. and Yalom, I. (1989). Concise Guide to Group Psychotherapy. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Wykes, T., Steel, C., Everitt, B. and Tarrier, N. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia: effect sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigor. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 523–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.