Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:02:43.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Training for Manuscript Handwriting on Generalization to Cursive Handwriting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Esther Kau-To Leung ,
Pat V. Treblas ,
John O. Cooper  and
Jennifer Trap Porter
Esther Kau-To Leung
Affiliation:
Faculty for Exceptional Children, The Ohio State University; U.S.A.
Pat V. Treblas
Affiliation:
Faculty for Exceptional Children, The Ohio State University; U.S.A.
John O. Cooper
Affiliation:
Faculty for Exceptional Children, The Ohio State University; U.S.A.
Jennifer Trap Porter
Affiliation:
Faculty for Exceptional Children, The Ohio State University; U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A multiple baseline design across subjects was employed to study the effects of training for manuscript handwriting on cursive letter formation. Ten first grade students received training to increase their accuracy in manuscript writing. Following training, all 10 students demonstrated increased accuracy in untrained cursive letter formation. Cursive letters were practiced but untrained in that no feedback on correctness was given at any session.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1982 , pp. 311 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. W. (1966). Handwriting research: Style and practice. In Research on Handwriting and Spelling, Horn, T. A. (Ed.), Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Askov, E., Otto, W. and Askov, W. (1970). A decade of research in handwriting: Progress and prospect. The Journal of Educational Research 64, 100–111.Google Scholar
Byers, L. (1963). The relationship of manuscript and cursive handwriting to accuracy in spelling. Journal of Educational Research 57, 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauke, J., Burnett, J., Powers, M. A. and Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1973). Improvement of handwriting and letter recognition skills: A behavior modification procedure. Journal of Learning Disabilities 6, 296–300.Google Scholar
Helwig, J. J., Johns, J. C., Norman, J. E. and Cooper, J. O. (1976). A brief technical report of the measurement of manuscript letter strokes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 9, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, G. (1960). Manuscript writing after sixty years. Elementary English 37, 3–13.Google Scholar
Johns, J. C., Trap, J. and Cooper, J. O. (1977). Students' self recording of manuscript letter strokes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10, 509–514.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. and Schneider, R. (1970). The use of a token system in project Head Start. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 3, 213–220.Google Scholar
Salzberg, B. H., Wheeler, A. J., Devar, L. T. and Hopkins, B. L. (1971). The effects of intermittent feedback and intermittent contingent access to play of printing of kindergarten children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 4, 163–171.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. New York: Meredith Corporation.Google Scholar
Sokolova, E. N. (1963). Development of writing habits in primary school children. Voprosy Psikhologii 5, 140–146.Google Scholar
Trap, J. J., Milner-Davis, P., Joseph, S. and Cooper, J. O. (1978). The effects of feedback and consequences on transitional cursive letter formation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis 11, 381–393.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.